The Corporate Tax Break Feeding Frenzy. (Interviews)

Multinational Monitor, November 2001 | Go to article overview

The Corporate Tax Break Feeding Frenzy. (Interviews)


An Interview with Nancy Watzman

Nancy Watzman is research and investigative projects director for Public Campaign, a group "dedicated to sweeping reform that aims to dramatically reduce the role of special interest money in Americas elections and the influence of big contributors in American politics." Public Campaign has recently launched a web site, www.howdarethey.org, which highlights wartime profiteering. Watzman is the author of a November 2001 Public Campaign study, "Buy Now, Save Later: Campaign Contributions and Corporate Taxation.

Multinational Monitor: Why do corporations want to eliminate the Alternative Minimum Tax?

Nancy Watzman: The alternative minimum tax (AMT) repeal provision -- which is in the Housepassed stimulus bill -- is a blatant give-away to large corporations, and is something they've been lobbying for for years.

The House stimulus package not only includes a repeal of the AMT, it also includes a rebate of any AMT payment that a corporation has made since the law was enacted.

Our analysis shows that 16 companies which would get $7.4 billion in immediate tax rebates under the House plan contributed nearly $46 million to federal candidates and parties since 1991. Two thirds of that money went to Republican candidates and party committees. So these are bigtime campaign money players, and have been for a long time.

MM: What is the Alternative Minimum Tax?

Watzman: The AMT was put in place in the 1980s because so many corporations were taking advantage of tax breaks and loopholes that they were often whittling their tax bills down to zero, or even less. The AMT requires companies to calculate taxes using regular rates and existing tax breaks, and also with a lower -- alternative minimum -- rate but fewer loopholes. They are supposed to pay the higher of the two.

MM: What would the repeal and rebate mean in terms of benefits for specific companies?

Watzman: Citizens for Tax Justice identified 16 companies as gaining the most. They include household names and major campaign contributors like ChevronTexaco, General Electric and Enron.

ChevronTexaco, for example, is the source of nearly $7 million in campaign contributions, and would get $572 million in immediate rebates. General Electric gave $6.2 million and would get $671 million in rebates. And the list goes on. These are all major, profitable companies.

MM: How long have the companies been campaigning to eliminate the AMT?

Watzman: Pretty much since it was passed in 1986. The House Ways and Means Committee passed a repeal of the AMT back in 1995, but the repeal never became law. The corporate lobby did manage to weaken the law somewhat in 1997.

Repeal has been on the wish list for a long time. They are shoving it through now at a time of crisis because it is an unpopular thing that normally would be pretty tough to get through Congress.

MM: The Public Campaign report also looks at other tax breaks that groups of companies have been lobbying for. What do you find in those other areas?

Watzman: As I mentioned, the AMT was put in place because companies take so many deductions that they whittle their taxes down to zero. The way they do it is through a whole long list of exotic tax breaks that most people know nothing about.

We looked at some of these in the report. We found major lobbying for loopholes by companies in the form of campaign contributions.

One example is a tax loophole called foreign sales corporations, where companies can claim credits on profits from exports. A bunch of companies are lobbying to save that tax break even though it has been declared illegal by the World Trade Organization.

It is also a great example of how these things get expanded and changed to benefit corporations.

Back in 1997, Microsoft led a lobbying campaign to get the tax break extended to software companies.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Corporate Tax Break Feeding Frenzy. (Interviews)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.