The Write Stuff: What the Evidence Says about Using Handwriting Analysis in Hiring

By Thomas, Steven L.; Vaught, Steve | SAM Advanced Management Journal, Autumn 2001 | Go to article overview

The Write Stuff: What the Evidence Says about Using Handwriting Analysis in Hiring


Thomas, Steven L., Vaught, Steve, SAM Advanced Management Journal


Introduction

In 1994, Stanford business professor Jeffrey Pfeffer wrote what has since become a widely read book on the relationship between human resource management (HRM) practices and organizational success called Competitive Advantage Through People. In his book, Pfeffer argues convincingly that the ability to harness the capabilities of the organization's human resources is more important to sustaining organizational effectiveness than are the traditional sources of competitive advantage such as proprietary technology or access to capital. While traditional sources of competitive advantage certainly cannot be ignored, increasingly competitive markets dictate that the ability to attract, hire, and develop the most capable talent will be the single most important long-term determinant or organizational success.

While it has always been difficult to attract capable and motivated employees, the realities of the labor force that include an aging population, a shrinking pool of younger workers, and a severe mismatch between the technological skills in demand and those skills available in the labor force, mean that attaining competitive advantage through the capabilities of a work force is more difficult than ever. To begin with, it is sometimes hard to induce people to apply for jobs. In response, employers have turned to a variety of alternative and creative recruiting techniques to attract larger pools of applicants. However, it is also difficult to select the best individuals from among those who do apply, and it does little good to attract more applicants if an organization is unable to accurately select individuals that best fit the company's needs. As a result, the employee selection process including screening and testing has become more critical than ever. There is evidence that employers have been willing to tr y a variety of selection tools -- some tried-and-true, others unproven -- in an effort to hire those most likely to provide that sought after competitive advantage.

One of those selection tools has been handwriting analysis, or graphology. This controversial selection device uses the systematic analysis of an applicant's handwriting sample to infer something about that individual's personality, his or her fit with the organization, or probable job performance. The purpose of this article is to reexamine the use of this technique, look at some of the research on its effectiveness, and determine if it is a tool managers can use as part of the process of staffing an organization.

Why is it important to take another look at graphology? In a recent edition of their popular human resource management textbook, John Bernardin and Joyce Russell discuss what they consider to be "glaring discrepancies" between human resource management as practiced and what is known from human resource research (Bernardin & Russell, 1998, p. 5). One of the most vivid examples of this gap is that HR research tells us that graphology is not a valid way in which to select employees, yet the use of graphology remains widespread in Europe and is actually on the increase in the United States. Estimates from the 1980s suggested substantial and increasing use of graphology, with more than 3,000 U.S. firms, and perhaps as many as 85% of European firms, using it. (McCarthy, 1988; Rafaeli & Klimoski, 1983), while other sources report that its use has grown since that time (Bernardin & Russell, 1998, p. 147; Driver et al., 1996). A host of anecdotal evidence suggests that managers routinely use graphology for screening j ob candidates (see, for example, Blanchi, 1996 and McCarthy, 1998) or in the workplace security (Brayer, 1998).

It seems that manages have considerably more faith in handwriting analysis as a tool for identifying applicant qualities than do researchers. This is an interesting paradox that deserves some attention. We focus our attention, therefore, on what research says about graphology to determine if the Barnardin and Russell criticism is justified, or conversely, if handwriting analysis may have some role in the staffing process. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Write Stuff: What the Evidence Says about Using Handwriting Analysis in Hiring
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.