Larson Fights Good Fight against Big Labor: For 40 Years, Reed Larson and the National Right to Work Committee Have Sought to Abolish Compulsory Union Membership and Expose Strong-Arm Political Activism by Labor Bosses

By Goode, Stephen | Insight on the News, May 17, 1999 | Go to article overview

Larson Fights Good Fight against Big Labor: For 40 Years, Reed Larson and the National Right to Work Committee Have Sought to Abolish Compulsory Union Membership and Expose Strong-Arm Political Activism by Labor Bosses


Goode, Stephen, Insight on the News


Reed E. Larson was working as an electrical engineer for the Coleman Co. of Wichita in the mid-1950s when he got involved in the successful struggle for a right-to-work law in his home state of Kansas. He then went off to Washington to work with the newly formed National Right to Work Committee, a job he tells Insight he planned to spend at most a couple of years doing but one that he's been at ever since.

Since 1976, Larson has been president of the National Right to Work Committee. His belief in the right of workers to hold jobs without coercion from labor unions and of not being required to hold union membership or pay dues springs from his vision of what it means to be a free American and from his faith.

"I'm a Southern Baptist," Larson tells Insight. "I think that the protection of individual conscience is fundamental to our religious belief, and the coercion of people by the government or by a private organization, like unions, with the backing of government is immoral."

A national right-to-work law advocated by Larson's organization now has stronger support in Congress than any other right-to-work law ever has had. The bill has 109 cosponsors in the House and the support of such Senate power brokers as Majority Leader Trent Lott of Mississippi. "We're a lot closer than we were three or four years ago," says Larson. "I think we'd have to be immodest so that the work we've done on it is getting noticed."

Insight: The year 2000 is going to be a big year for the labor unions as far as the elections go, isn't it?

Reed E. Larson: Yes, it sure is. [AFL-CIO President John] Sweeney has made it pretty clear they're going to do more of what they've done during the past two [election] cycles while he's been in the driver's seat of the AFL-CIO.

Somebody has described Sweeney's campaign in '96 as an "air war" and in '98 as a "ground war." In '96 he beat his chest, and they did lots of television and a more public campaign. They put hundreds of millions of dollars into so-called "issues" discussion -- "nonpolitical education" -- that type of thing.

In '96, it was a very high-profile, thoroughly visible campaign. But in '98 they put it into staff and it was a lot less visible, and they were more effective.

Insight: The ground war was more effective?

REL: I think it was. They admitted sending out 70,000 staff in the last weeks of the election. I think they're really more effective at getting their people registered and to the polls and they know generally how they're going to vote, and if they've got people that they know don't support the union, they're going to be less likely to get them on the list of the people they move to the polls.

Insight: Is union power on the increase?

REL: At this moment, perhaps. There's a little more militancy since Sweeney took over. He's at least been more noisy. What has happened since 40 years ago -- when union membership was the highest it's ever been as a percentage of the workforce -- is that membership gradually declined as a percentage of the workforce. The union leadership as a result has concentrated more and more on achieving its ends through political power.

The biggest union is now the teachers' union, the NEA [National Education Association], with almost 2.5 million members. You've got the AFT [American Federation of Teachers] pushing 1 million members. The union movement now is very heavily influenced by the public-sector unions. But their political objectives are very, very similar to [private-sector unions such as] the AFL-CIO. The candidates they support are always big government, pro-tax, more government control, and so their objectives are going to be very similar.

Insight: In 1996, Rutgers University economist Leo Troy testified before Congress that union officials may pour as much as a half-billion dollars into federal politics each election cycle. Is this accurate? …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Larson Fights Good Fight against Big Labor: For 40 Years, Reed Larson and the National Right to Work Committee Have Sought to Abolish Compulsory Union Membership and Expose Strong-Arm Political Activism by Labor Bosses
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.