Evangelical Theologians Reject `Open Theism'. (News)

By Gorski, Eric | The Christian Century, December 12, 2001 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Evangelical Theologians Reject `Open Theism'. (News)

Gorski, Eric, The Christian Century

Taking a stand in line with their conservative core, members of the Evangelical Theological Society have approved a resolution rejecting "open theism"--the belief that God does not fully know the future because people have been given the freedom to help shape it through their decisions.

The society was far from united, however, on how to deal with the small number of scholars in their ranks who advocate open theism, which has been called heretical by some and enlightening by others. The issue dominated discussion at the society's 53rd annual meeting in mid-November at Colorado Springs.

The resolution, approved by roughly 70 percent of the 360 society members who cast ballots on November 16, states, "We believe the Bible clearly teaches that God has complete, accurate and infallible knowledge of all events past, present and future, including all future decisions and actions of free moral agents." About 18 percent of voting members opposed it and another 11 percent abstained.

Resolution supporters characterized it as a "snapshot" of the society's opinion that would be used to guide future decisions. Critics called the vote a precursor to excluding open theists. Still others complained the movement was far too new for members to take a stand on it. Wayne Grudem, a member of the society's executive committee, which wrote the resolution, called it a "gentle nudge" for open theists either to change their minds or "seriously consider leaving." Grudem, who teaches at Phoenix Theological Seminary, and others say open theism undermines the central evangelical belief of biblical inerrancy.

Open theism, also called free-will theism, was introduced to a broader public in 1994 with the publication of The Openness of God by five evangelical scholars, including its editor, Clark Pinnock. The book's back-cover self-description says God desires "responsive relationships" with his creatures. "While it rejects process theology, the book asserts that such classical doctrines as God's immutability, impassability and foreknowledge demand reconsideration."

Dozens of books and articles on this issue--pro and con--have appeared since then. The issue caused a rift in the 900-congregation Baptist General Conference, which in 1999 narrowly rejected a motion challenging open theism. Open theism has found some favor with Pentecostals who view it in terms of a spirited give-and-take with God.

John Sanders, a leading proponent of open theism and professor at Huntington (Indiana) College, has written that "God does not control everything that happens.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Evangelical Theologians Reject `Open Theism'. (News)


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?