Defense First: The National-Security Team Is Devoted to Dismantling the Failed Defense Policies That Came Back to Haunt America on Sept. 11. (Cover Story)

By Waller, J. Michael | Insight on the News, December 24, 2001 | Go to article overview

Defense First: The National-Security Team Is Devoted to Dismantling the Failed Defense Policies That Came Back to Haunt America on Sept. 11. (Cover Story)


Waller, J. Michael, Insight on the News


President George W. Bush is on the brink of a stunning new accomplishment in defense of the nation. Bit by bit, senior administration figures tell INSIGHT, he is dismantling what they say he regards as a failed and discredited system of treaties, arms-control processes and official cover, ups that have hog-tied the United States for decades while allowing adversaries and rogue regimes to develop, proliferate and deploy weapons of mass destruction. Presidential insiders say Bush believes a decade of morally corrupt winks and nods at proliferators and state sponsors of terrorism helped make possible the carnage of Sept. 11.

Never again, Bush says. No more slaps on the wrist. No more looking the other way. No more haggling over endless negotiations or cramming for artificial deadlines, knowing all the while that the bad guys will lie and cheat and that the State Department will help conceal their embarrassment.

Even before Sept. 11, members of Bush's national-security team blamed the antique arms-control process for preventing the United States from defending itself against emerging missile threats, while rewarding Russia and China as they sold biological-, chemical -- and nuclear-weapons technology -- and the missiles to deliver them -- to terrorist regimes.

Incredibly, Bush's lieutenants are finding what one source calls "rank insubordination" within the State Department and elsewhere. INSIGHT has learned that some U.S. officials opposed to the new policy have collaborated with foreign governments to embarrass, discredit and undermine the president's own representatives and thereby prevent his policies from being implemented, even after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

In a meeting with two American Christian missionaries freed from Taliban imprisonment in Afghanistan, Bush equated terrorists and proliferators: "If anybody harbors a terrorist, they're a terrorist. If they fund a terrorist, they're a terrorist. If they house terrorists, they're terrorists. I mean, I can't make it any more clear to other nations around the world. If they develop weapons of mass destruction that will be used to terrorize nations, they will be held accountable."

The president was echoing the words of his senior adviser for arms control and nonproliferation, Undersecretary of State John R. Bolton. In a Nov. 19 speech to an international Biological Weapons Convention meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, Bolton said the United States is "concerned about the potential use of biological weapons by terrorist groups and states that support them." He told amazed delegates, "I plan to name names. Prior to Sept. 11, some would have avoided this approach. The world has changed, however, and so must our business-as-usual approach."

Bolton rattled off the list: Iraq, North Korea, Iran, Libya, Syria and the Sudan. "There are other states I could have named which the United States will be contacting privately concerning our belief that they are pursuing an offensive BW [biological-weapons] program," he said in a frank pronouncement. Administration sources tell INSIGHT that those countries include Russia and China, which are a "central element" to the supply of rogue and terrorist regimes. Because of the complex and far-reaching relationships the United States has with Moscow and Beijing, officials say, the administration is not ready to single them out. At least, not yet.

That was too much for some of the assembled international diplomats and for U.S. government officials. INSIGHT has learned that a fourth-echelon arms-control doyenne has leaked internal policy material to foreign governments in the hope that they would protest and thus force Secretary of State Colin Powell pre-emptively to kill the president's new, assertive policies. That is how easily Clinton holdovers and other arms-control apostles feel Powell can be manipulated.

Bush now has assembled a national-security team devoted to overturning the establishment idea that the nation's safety is best ensured by pieces of paper, endless diplomatic talks, artificial deadlines and multilateral handholding. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Defense First: The National-Security Team Is Devoted to Dismantling the Failed Defense Policies That Came Back to Haunt America on Sept. 11. (Cover Story)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.