Australia's Implementation of the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions

By Wilder, Martijn; Ahrens, Michael | Melbourne Journal of International Law, December 2001 | Go to article overview

Australia's Implementation of the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions


Wilder, Martijn, Ahrens, Michael, Melbourne Journal of International Law


I INTRODUCTION

On 16 December 1996 the UN adopted the United Nations Declaration against Corruption and Bribery in International Commercial Transactions. (1) The Declaration committed UN members to criminalise bribery in an effective and coordinated manner and to deny tax deductibility for bribes. Approximately a year later the Declaration was endorsed by the 29 member states of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (`OECD') adopting the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions (`OECD Convention'). (2) In doing so, OECD members agreed to establish legislation criminalising the bribing of foreign public officials by the end of 1998. (3) In keeping with this commitment, Australia prepared appropriate draft legislation, the Criminal Code Amendment (Bribery of Foreign Public Officials) Bill 1998 (Cth). Following a National Interest Analysis and a public review process by the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties (`JSCT'), this bill was passed in revised form on 3 June 1999 as the Criminal Code Amendment (Bribery of Foreign Public Officials) Act 1999 (Cth) (`Bribery Act'). (4)

The passage of the legislation signifies a clear intention by the Federal Government, not only to address the issue of bribery of foreign corrupt officials, but also to ensure a legal regime that is consistent with the approach taken by other OECD countries, in particular the United States. Furthermore, as indicated by the Attorney-General's Department, (5) only a consistent approach by all OECD countries will address the ramifications of the bribery of foreign public officials.

It appears generally accepted that Australian firms are not significantly involved in corrupt practices overseas and that, arguably, Australian firms will ultimately benefit from the predicted reduction in the incidence of international bribery resulting from the OECD's action. (6) Nonetheless during the consultation process a number of Australian companies, and particularly the various Chambers of Commerce, voiced opposition to the ratification of the OECD Convention. (7)

Most opponents argued that not only will adoption of the OECD Convention hurt Australia's ability to compete for projects in the region, (8) but that it will also particularly disadvantage small and medium-sized enterprises. In any event, the document does nothing to attack corruption `at the coal face', as it makes no mention of the extortion of bribes, nor does it try to penalise recipients. Furthermore, concern was expressed as to how companies could distinguish between necessary girls or facilitation payments and bribes as future criminalised activities. These questions will ultimately be decided by courts after the event. Criticisms of this nature are similar to those which have been raised by US businesses in relation to the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (`FCPA'). (9)

Despite the opposition that exists, the passing of the Australian Bribery Act evidences Australia's clear intention to combat the negative effects caused by the international bribery of foreign officials. On its face, the legislation is severe. However, the real issue remains the extent to which, in practice, the Bribery Act will be implemented and enforced.

II THE PROBLEM OF CORRUPTION

The true cost of corruption worldwide is unknown, but it certainly runs into the billions of dollars. (10) Despite this, with the exception of the US, little effort has been made to combat this problem. While some, particularly in the West, see it as simply a part of doing business, corruption in international business transactions has significant deleterious effects. Widespread bribery:

* Grossly distorts the tendering process for government contracts. This leads to more costly projects and, often, an adverse effect on the quality of the work;

* Distorts the prioritisation of major projects (encouraging `white elephant' investment projects);

* Diverts money from public accounts to private individuals and often into foreign bank accounts. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Australia's Implementation of the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.