Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Polish Society in the Perpective of Its Integration with the European Union

By: Mucha, Janusz; Szczepanski, Marek S. | East European Quarterly, Winter 2001 | Article details

Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

Polish Society in the Perpective of Its Integration with the European Union


Mucha, Janusz, Szczepanski, Marek S., East European Quarterly


IN THE EUROPEAN WAITING ROOM

A complete integration of Poland with the European Union, scheduled (in May 2001) for 2004, will undoubtedly be another momentous process in the country's history, after its withdrawal from the Soviet (and later Russian) sphere of interests and after the implementation of the rule of law and the Western-style civic liberties. These processes started twelve years ago. European integration can contribute to the final break with the, mostly economic and civilization, processes of "long duration," processes which, already at the end of the 15th century (the "long 16th century" in Fernand Braudel's terminology) gradually began to locate Poland on the Europe's peripheries. Those processes were strengthened by the political dependence, first in the form of partition among Russia, Germany and Austria (1772, 1775, and finally 1795) and later by the domination of the Soviet Union which lasted since 1944 for nearly half a century. The process of European integration is in the case of Poland (but also in the case of Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Estonia, to name the main regional candidates), simultaneous with the other process, that of systemic transformation toward liberal democracy and market economy. The successes in each of those two processes (taking place according to different rules, though) speed up the latter process, while failures of each contribute to the slowing down of another one.

It is worth noting that some countries which had belonged for at least two hundred years to the European peripheries, managed to improve their overall situation to a significant extent during the last fifty years. Although Spain and Portugal were not politically dependent on the other powers, Greece and Ireland were. Those four countries were accepted by the European Union (earlier--Community) mostly for political not economic reasons, but later on the membership in the Union gave them a chance for a considerable civilization advancement. On the eve of its access to the Union, Poland should compare itself with those four, and not with much better economically developed countries like Germany, Belgium, France, the Netherlands, or England. Economic (particularly agri-cultural) problems that the former four had twenty years ago are similar to the problems Poland faces at present. It should be added that even the well developed European countries had, in the past, to cope with some conflict-generating problems which Poland faces nowadays, such as economic, social and cultural revival/reconstruction of the "old industrial regions."

CIVILIZATION BACKWARDNESS IN A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

In addition to the problems posed by traditional industrial regions and by agriculture, the basic problem of Poland on its way to the united Europe is its civilization "backwardness" (in terms of economy, technology, technical infrastructure, organizational and social infrastructure). Historically consolidated and subordinated to the rules of the "long duration," that backwardness has manifested itself for several centuries in a clear and unilateral adaptation of Polish economy to the demands of the better developed countries, regions, and even cities of Europe (like England, the Netherlands, the Hanseatic cities), and later of big continental organizations (European Community and then Union). Recently, for nearly fifty years, Poland had to adapt to the economic, structural and cultural system of the Soviet Union. The backwardness had also revealed itself in the too slow process of emergence of new social classes, particularly of the urban middle class (bourgeois) which--in the historical perspective--could have organized the economic growth and development and could have, therefore, helped depart from the mono-cultural economy and inefficient, in terms of variety, export of goods (like grain, timber, hem, and later on coal, copper and steal). In spite of political successes and a great liveliness of its symbolic culture, already in the 17th century Poland was, in comparison to the leading European powers, a backward country in terms of economy and civilization. Today, after several centuries, this historic Polish backwardness which can hopefully disappear now, due to European integration, can be described by the use of many indicators and through presentation of many significant processes. In our opinion, the most important manifestations of this backwardness are:

1. The structure of the labor force is antiquated. Industry and agriculture still dominate and the "third sector," both in a traditional sense of commerce and craftsmanship and in a modern sense of banking, health service, insurance, real estate, information technology, etc., is weak. The percentage of people employed in the third sector has not increased during the period of systemic transformation.

Poland is still an industrial country, but hopefully the perspective of reaching a postindustrial stage does not seem to be very remote.

2. The ownership relations in the field of production means are also antiquated with too big a share of the state ownership and insufficient--despite the numerous positive signs--private sector. From the strictly legal point of view, the share of the private sector in Poland is smaller than in the Czech Republic or in Slovakia. However, the class structure has been, since 1989, undergoing radical trans-formations, for the second time during the fifty years (the first time took place immediately after World War II and the Communist takeover).

3. The structure of export (mostly relatively …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?