Validation of X-Ray Fluorescence-Measured Swine Femur Lead against Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. (Articles)

By Todd, Andrew C.; Moshier, Erin L. et al. | Environmental Health Perspectives, November 2001 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Validation of X-Ray Fluorescence-Measured Swine Femur Lead against Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. (Articles)

Todd, Andrew C., Moshier, Erin L., Carroll, Spencer, Casteel, Stanley W., Environmental Health Perspectives

The aim of this study was to apply the technique of [sup.109]Cd-based K-shell X-ray fluorescence (XRF) bone lead measurements to swine femurs and to validate the concentrations obtained therefrom against an independent chemical measurement of bone lead: atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS). The femurs ranged in lead concentration from 1.0 to 24.5 [micro]g of lead per gram of ashed bone, as measured by AAS. On average, XRF overestimated AAS-measured femur lead by 2.6 [micro]g/g [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-4.0 [micro]g/g], approximately 2 [micro]g/g poorer than that observed in studies of human tibiae. Measurements of swine femur and, by extension, of nonhuman bones may require adjustment of the XRF spectrum peak extraction method. Key words: atomic absorption, lead poisoning, spectrometry, spectrophotometry, X-ray fluorescence. Environ Health Perspect 109:1115-1119 (2001). [Online 19 October 2001]

Exposure to lead is monitored most commonly by measuring blood lead levels, and in the United States the criteria for lead poisoning and lead toxicity are based on blood lead as a standard. However, the biologic residence time of lead in blood is approximately 36 days (1), and it is therefore an indicator only of recent lead exposure. Moreover, the concentration of lead in blood is a composite index that reflects the equilibrium among current exogenous exposure, excretory loss, and the movement of lead between bone and other deep compartments (endogenous exposure). The relative contribution to the blood lead level of each of these sources varies with the levels of current exposure and body burden.

Lead is stored in the human body predominantly in calcified tissues; 90-95% of the total lead burden is contained within bone in nonoccupationally exposed adults (2,3). The turnover rate of lead in bone is slow; quantitative estimates of the characteristic residence time vary, but there is a consensus that it is on the order of years or even decades (1,4-6). Throughout childhood and most of adult life, lead exposure from both environmental and occupational sources increases lead concentration within calcified tissue. Bone lead content thus reflects integrated or cumulative lead exposure (7).

Bone lead can be measured noninvasively and in vivo by the technique of [sup.109]Cd photon-induced K-shell energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (XRF) (6,8,9). The 88.034 keV gamma rays emitted by a [sup.109]Cd source are used to excite the lead atoms contained in bone. The lead atoms in the bone subsequently de-excite and may thereby emit X rays of energy specific to lead. The lead X rays are recorded by a radiation detector and, when compared with calibration data, yield a measure of the lead content of the bone. Although the technique delivers a radiation dose to the subject, the radiation dose and consequent risk arising from an XRF bone lead measurement are very small for all age groups, including children (10).

Three previous reports in the literature compare [sup.109]Cd KXRF to independent chemical measurements of lead in bone in humans. Somervaille et al. (11) analyzed 30 bone samples and found no evidence of a statistically significant difference between XRF and atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS). Hu et al. (12) analyzed eight locations from three legs and reported a correlation coefficient of 0.98 between XRF and AAS. Aro et al. (13), using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, measured eight cadaver legs and also reported the agreement with XRF as correlation coefficients.

Herein we report results of a comparison between XRF and AAS measurements of the lead concentration in 44 swine femurs. Validation of our XRF method using animal bones interests us because animals that have undergone controlled dosing with lead may serve in the future as a source of calibration, validation, or standard reference materials for human XRF measurements.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Validation of X-Ray Fluorescence-Measured Swine Femur Lead against Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. (Articles)


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?