Reasoning as a Key Component of Language Arts Curricula

By Little, Catherine | Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, Winter 2002 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Reasoning as a Key Component of Language Arts Curricula

Little, Catherine, Journal of Secondary Gifted Education


One of the central purposes of education is not only to provide students with the information they need to face and understand the world around them, but also to provide the skills they need in order to analyze that world and manage the various types of issues and problems they will encounter. Considerable debate exists in education as to whether and how critical thinking should be taught and encouraged in schools. Among the many existing models of thinking, Paul's (1992) elements of reasoning stand out as a strong foundation for careful consideration of issues in and out of the classroom. The model represents a strong core of higher level thinking that can be embedded within content areas, especially language arts and social studies, so that students have the opportunity to recognize and assess their thinking processes as part of their central content, rather than as a disconnected piece unto itself Applications of the model to specific learning activities in existing language arts curricula include question ing strategies, persuasive writing, and research.

Issues and questions are the stuff of life--the basis for learning, thinking, developing understanding, and interaction among people and groups. In every area of life and every discipline of study, questions provide purpose and a basis for action, and these purposes and actions carry implications and consequences that lead us back to new questions and issues. Our attempts to grapple with these questions, to find direction and support for our actions, are the very processes of reasoning that makes us human. Thus, reasoning forms the substance of how we face our environment and learn to live within it.

As educators, our underlying purpose is to provide students with the tools they will need to face the issues and questions that confront them inside and outside the classroom. Consequently, we ourselves are faced with the question of how best to accomplish this purpose. If we accept the assumption that our lives are a series of issues and questions to be addressed and that reasoning is the process by which we address these questions, the implication is that education should involve the development of reasoning skills. On this premise, the issue then becomes how such skills should be taught in schools.

Critical Thinking: To Teach or Not to Teach?

Critical thinking, the global phrase commonly used within education circles to include various forms of reasoning, is a category of varied definitions and interpretations of the processes that go on in the mind when it is faced with a question or problem requiring more than simple recall. Programs for gifted students have often been designed to support advanced thinking abilities through structured teaching and practice of models for thinking (Feldhusen, 1994). However, there is considerable debate as to exactly what critical thinking represents, whether it can be taught, and how and to whom it should be presented. Smith (1990) has argued persuasively that critical thinking is nor a skill reserved for the highly intelligent or well-educated, but rather that it is a process constantly ongoing in each of our lives; that is, that thinking and learning are a part of who we are in every conscious moment from birth until death unless we fall victim to unusual brain injury or illness. Critical thinking, in Smith's view, is employed in our everyday actions and decisions, ranging from the decisions of what clothing to wear in the morning to highly intellectual discussions of global issues faced now and throughout history. in this view,

Descartes' famous statement "I think, therefore I am can be converted to "I am, therefore I think."

Nevertheless, critical thinking is considered by many educators to be an area of great weakness among students in the United States. Halpern (1996), for example, attributed poor performance by U.S. students on international comparison tests to limited skills in critical thinking.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Reasoning as a Key Component of Language Arts Curricula


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?