Asian Perceptions of BMD: Defence or Disequilibrium?

By Tow, William T.; Choong, William | Contemporary Southeast Asia, December 2001 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Asian Perceptions of BMD: Defence or Disequilibrium?


Tow, William T., Choong, William, Contemporary Southeast Asia


**********

As geopolitical competition between the United States and China intensifies, East Asian policy-makers are apprehensive about the Bush Administration's plans to develop ballistic missile defence (BMD). Missile defence threatens to undermine other fundamental assumptions about nuclear weapons politics and arms control. This article argues that, if not carefully managed, BMD could undermine Washington's extended deterrence commitments to its regional friends and allies. Initially, a brief summary of developments leading to Asian concerns about missile defence will be offered. How BMD may affect Washington's extended deterrence strategy in the region will be reviewed. Southeast Asia is emphasized here because this sub region has been largely ignored in previous analyses of BMD's impact on Asia-Pacific stability. The article concludes by offering two policy recommendations regarding the applicability of BMD to A SEAN'S security environment.

Introduction

A decade after the Soviet Union's demise, the shape of post-Cold War geopolitics is changing rapidly. The United States under President George W. Bush appears to be reverting to a very realist world-view that advocates building up unparalleled U.S. military power but using it only sparingly. This is in sharp contrast to the posture adopted by his liberal predecessor, Bill Clinton, who frequently deployed U.S. forces for humanitarian intervention and peacekeeping operations in Europe and who entertained a vision of a prosperous and stable "Pacific Community". Strategists are debating the implications of current structural changes in international relations, with some interpreting them as foreshadowing a "unipolar world" dominated by the United States and others anticipating that a complex multipolar configuration is taking shape.

Opponents of BMD counter that such weapon systems pose dramatic diplomatic and strategic threats to global stability. They threaten what is regarded as a still stable strategic nuclear balance between the United States and Russia and the strategic arms control agreements, such as the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty, that underwrite it. They will strengthen China's motivation to accelerate its nuclear force capabilities. They will lead to nuclear arms proliferation in Asia and the Middle East. Most alarmingly, BMD will blur the distinction between strategic offence and defence, thus intensifying arms races and security dilemmas. (2)

Ballistic missile defence (BMD) has emerged as one of the key factors in this debate. American proponents of BMD argue that the world has relied on the strategy of nuclear deterrence for too long: expecting all nuclear weapons states, including so-called "rogue states" (whose goals and values may diverge greatly from those held by traditional nuclear powers), to exercise restraint in future crises is, they assert historically misguided and strategically unsound. A sound missile defence technology will redress the faulty perception of common "rationality" that has dominated strategic nuclear planning throughout the post-war era. The United States and its forces stationed abroad are becoming increasingly valnerable to the threat of ballistic and cruise missile attacks by "rogue states" that are hostile to its values and interests. Established nuclear powers, such as Russia and China, will continue to pursue their own nuclear strategies and force development, whether BMD is deployed or not, and with their own deterrence postures will be unaffected by the limited missile defence protection BMD is designed provide. In an environment of increasing strategic uncertainly created by the expansion of potentially hostile WMD (weapons of mass destruction) proliferents, missile defence must be developed and deployed to defend the United States, its forward-deployed forces, and its friends and allies. (1)

During the early days of his presidency, George W. Bush made clear his intentions to deploy both a National Missile Defence (NMD) version of BMD to protect the U.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Asian Perceptions of BMD: Defence or Disequilibrium?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?