"Think globally, act locally" is still one of the best slogans progressives ever slapped across the backside of a vehicle. But the leap from bumper-sticker admonition to political reality has proven difficult, as the movement to challenge economic globalization has come to realize that even the most colorful street demonstrations are not enough to halt the forward march of corporate capital. That recognition should serve as the inspiration for a serious rethinking of how the movement will approach the next stage in what must be seen as a very long struggle. It is time to stop waiting for the next Seattle and to start thinking about how US activists can most effectively contribute to global justice: by adding the considerable weight of this movement to tipping the balance in a Congress where the biggest globalization fight of 2001 was decided by a single vote.
There is still a good deal of educational and political value to in-your-face challenges to the mandarins of multinational corporations, such as the January 30-February 4 rallies, marches and teach-ins organized to coincide with the World Economic Forum's New York sessions. And there is every reason to be excited about parallel gatherings of such civil society groups as the World Social Forum in Porto Alegre, Brazil, especially as they lay the groundwork for the coming struggle over the scope and character of the proposed Free Trade Area of the Americas agreement. But a strategy built around protests and teach-ins runs the risk of creating a false sense of progress while advocates for a corporate-friendly vision of globalization keep winning the most important battles. Such was the case in December when the House voted 215 to 214 to grant President Bush fast-track authority to negotiate the FTAA. Using evidence of how the North American Free Trade Agreement has undermined the ability of the United States, Canada and Mexico to protect the environment, regulate business and preserve family farms, Public Citizen, the Sierra Student Coalition and the AFL-CIO convinced several House Democrats to abandon their free-trade stances. But they could not sway the one more member needed to deny the President the power he identifies as the single most important tool for asserting the globalization agenda favored by corporate allies like Enron's Ken Lay.
"The corporate influence is …
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: Grassroots Globalism. Contributors: Not available. Magazine title: The Nation. Volume: 274. Issue: 6 Publication date: February 18, 2002. Page number: 3. © 1999 The Nation Company L.P. COPYRIGHT 2002 Gale Group.