Medical Detection of False Witness: High-Tech Lie Detectors One Day May Be Impossible to Fool, but So Far the Only Guarantee Is That They Will Stir Up as Much Controversy as the Original Polygraph. (Nation: Techno-Security)

By Spun, Brandon | Insight on the News, February 4, 2002 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Medical Detection of False Witness: High-Tech Lie Detectors One Day May Be Impossible to Fool, but So Far the Only Guarantee Is That They Will Stir Up as Much Controversy as the Original Polygraph. (Nation: Techno-Security)


Spun, Brandon, Insight on the News


Try this scenario: Zacarias Moussaoui is led out of a dark cell into a silent room at an undisclosed location. An electrode headset is fitted to his skull while his lawyer watches disapprovingly. After nearly an hour of flicking switches and flashing lights, the procedure concludes. An investigator reviews the results and determines exactly what role Moussaoui played in the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. You cannot hide your memories from the machine.

Some say this no longer is science fiction. In the months following Sept. 11, articles about techno-security have appeared in the popular press and in professional journals promising just such a result from high-tech lie detectors. One of these machines was featured in the New York Times Magazine's "2001 Encyclopedia of Innovations, Conceptual Leaps and Harebrained Schemes." An INSIGHT review of new polygraph technologies suggests that most of them fit all three categories.

"When one uses any kind of lie detector, one is saying `ask the body, not the person,'" says Mike Gazzaniga, director of the Center for Cognitive Neuroscience based at Dartmouth College. "One assumes with autonomic studies [polygraphs] that the body can't lie," Gazzaniga says. The assumption is that the body's autonomic reactions -- such as blood pressure, breathing and heart rate -- cannot be manipulated to support deception. "They assume that lies are mental constructs," Gazzaniga continues. "Among those things that separate man from animal is his capacity for deception. The question is how to make a science and not folk psychology out of this."

One investigative method established for autonomic research is the "guilty-knowledge test," which consists of confronting a suspect with a series of items, some relevant to a crime and others irrelevant. It is believed that a subject who has "guilty knowledge" will react most strongly to relevant or target items, while an innocent person will not.

Such tests have been disputed since the first polygraph was invented by William Marston in 1917. A polygraph can be an effective tool, but high-profile cases such as those of Aldrich Ames and Robert Hanssen, spies who beat the machine, frequently are cited to show its fallibility. Critics point out that data gathered from these tests are indicative of physiological response rather than veracity, with the latter being distinguished from the former. They say there is no necessary connection between a subject's verbal and physical report.

Polygraph expert Drew Richardson, a former FBI special agent at Quantico Laboratories, says "the test is generally not admissible in court because it is largely not accepted as a valid scientific technique."

But what if a better mousetrap were to become available? What if there were a machine that could not be fooled? What if an autonomic response to lying were to be identified that could not be suppressed? Recently, some have made such claims. Here is a look at those claims and what is being said about them.

Brain fingerprinting: According to Larry Farwell, an independent psychophysiologist at Human Brain Research Laboratory in Fairfield, Iowa, the fundamental difference between a guilty and innocent person is a record of the crime stored in the brain. "The difference between a terrorist who has been through a training camp and an Afghan student is the memory," Farwell says. Brain fingerprinting identifies memories, he claims.

This examination consists of a modified guilty-knowledge test that uses targets and irrelevants, but adds probes that are unique details of a crime that only the culprit could know. All subjects are familiarized with the targets in order actively to identify them during the test. A guilty subject is expected to have the same response to the probes as to the targets.

When one is exposed to something that already is stored in memory, the brain emits an electrical response called a p300 wave.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Medical Detection of False Witness: High-Tech Lie Detectors One Day May Be Impossible to Fool, but So Far the Only Guarantee Is That They Will Stir Up as Much Controversy as the Original Polygraph. (Nation: Techno-Security)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?