Hanging Up on AT&T. (Names in the News)
Mokhiber, Russell, Multinational Monitor
RULING THAT CONSUMER RIGHTS cannot be stripped way in a form contract, a federal judge in San Francisco in January found unlawful AT&T form contract provisions that required mandatory arbitration on discriminatory terms in case of consumer disputes with the company.
"AT&T sought to shield itself from liability ... by imposing legal remedies provisions that eliminate class actions, sharply curtail damages in cases of misrepresentation, fraud, and other intentional torts, cloak the arbitration process with secrecy and place significant financial hurdles in the path of a potential litigant," U.S. District Court Judge Bernard Zimmerman ruled.
"It is not just that AT&T wants to litigate in the forum of its choice -- arbitration -- it is that AT&T wants to make it very difficult for anyone to effectively vindicate her rights, even in that forum. That is illegal and unconscionable and must be enjoined."
The suit, Ting v. AT&T, is a class …
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: Hanging Up on AT&T. (Names in the News). Contributors: Mokhiber, Russell - Author. Magazine title: Multinational Monitor. Publication date: January 2002. Page number: 45. © 1999 Essential Information, Inc. COPYRIGHT 2002 Gale Group.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.