Letters

Clinical Psychiatry News, February 2002 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Letters


Handcuffed by Managed Care

All of us should applaud Surgeon General David Satcher's efforts to approach suicide as a public health problem ("MDs Can Do More to Cut Suicide Rate," June 2001, p. 1).

A national strategy for suicide prevention is an excellent idea, but how can psychiatrists improve when the tools we use to prevent suicide are controlled by managed care? Acute psychiatric beds are shrinking in number, but acutely suicidal persons often require hospitalization to be stabilized. Lengths of stay on psychiatric units are governed by short stay demands, not by the degree of suicidal risk.

In most mental health offices, psychiatrists only manage medication; they are rarely involved in patients' individual psychotherapy. How well can we actually know patients when we are prevented from conducting in-depth assessments? How well can we ascertain the seriousness of suicidal ideation when we have so little time to explore it?

It often takes several weeks or months to find the correct medications for persons with chronic depression or unstable mood disorders. After starting an antidepressant, patients often require closer monitoring because, as their mood lifts, their risk of suicide may intensify. The number of office visits, however, is not determined by the clinician but by the insurance agency.

Psychiatric disorders such as borderline personality disorder and schizophrenia require intensive psychotherapy in conjunction with medication and social support. Research has borne out that medication alone is inferior to medication and psychotherapy, yet psychotherapy is often absent in the care of these individuals.

If we wish to look seriously at the issue of suicide in this nation, we must first address the significant constraints placed upon psychiatrists in their efforts to assess, diagnose, and treat those who are at risk.

Gina Orton, M.D.

Washington

Psychiatry and Politics

The article "WTC Attack Ushers in a New Breed of Terrorist," along with its subhead, "Intelligent, highly skilled, and delusional," reminded me of the practice in the Soviet Union of labeling political dissidents as mentally ill (October 2001, p. 1).

In both cases, the motivation of such labeling (as delusional or mentally ill) appears to be the desire to avoid consideration and discussion of the actual, political motives of the terrorist or dissident. This kind of head-in-the-sand response only preserves the gap in understanding and communication between the parties involved.

David R. Sillars, M.D.

Skaneateles, N.Y.

Classification Debate Continues

I was moved to write after reading Dr. David Spiegel's stunningly misguided critique of the ideas on psychiatric nosology taught by Dr. Paul McHugh over the past 25 years ("Crafting the DSM-IV," Guest Editorial, August 2001, p.31).

Dr. Spiegel attacked the view that there are four perspectives from which psychiatric disorders are best considered-disease, dimension, behavior, and life story--by arguing that the DSM-IV's categorical approach to all kinds of psychiatric disorder is more or less right because all disorders are more or less based in human biology and psychology. He wrongly asserted that Dr. McHugh's view "attempts to enshrine in the nosology the idea that some disorders are real biologic diseases while others are simply problems involving failures of learning, behavior, or life circumstance."

Application of Dr. McHugh's four psychiatric perspectives involves no such thing. It is not a nosologic system per se, but a clarification of the methods of psychiatric formulation. We practitioners of the perspectives approach do not over-simplify patients as belonging to one or another perspective, but rather apply all the perspectives to each patient, as appropriate. If a patient with anorexia nervosa, for example, has a syndrome of major depression and an unstable temperament and a horrific background, we understand and treat all these problems, in turn, using the appropriate methods.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Letters
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?