Banned from the Courtroom: Despite Worldwide Interest, a Federal Judge Rules against Electronic Coverage of the Zacarias Moussaoui Case. (First Amendment Watch)

By Kirtley, Jane | American Journalism Review, March 2002 | Go to article overview

Banned from the Courtroom: Despite Worldwide Interest, a Federal Judge Rules against Electronic Coverage of the Zacarias Moussaoui Case. (First Amendment Watch)


Kirtley, Jane, American Journalism Review


On January 17, Attorney General John D. Ashcroft made a very good case for

why federal District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema should allow cameras in the upcoming trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the French national who is to be tried in October on charges stemming from the September attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. Ashcroft released videotapes and still photographs of five suspected al Qaeda members--including Ramzi Binalshibh, an unindicted coconspirator in the case against Moussaoui. The images of the men were posted on the FBI's Web site, where, as Ashcroft put it, they would provide "another opportunity for the public around the world to join the campaign against terrorism" by helping law enforcement to locate them.

During the press conference, a reporter asked Ashcroft whether posting the images on the Internet would unnecessarily frighten people or prompt them to accuse innocent individuals who might resemble the suspected terrorists. Ashcroft said by releasing the photographs and the video rather than "generalized identification," the risk of mistakes would be far less. "The American people are accustomed to being a part of this investigation...and they realize they can be a constructive part," he said.

It's unusual for Ashcroft to embrace freedom of information as a means to encourage citizen participation, but more power to him for doing so. It shows a confidence in the public that is as commendable as it is justified. What a shame that Brinkema didn't see it that way Instead, only one day after Ashcroft's press conference, she ruled that cameras and other recording devices would be banned from Moussaoui's trial in Alexandria, Virginia.

In many ways, Brinkema's decision was predictable. After all, the media companies who argued the case for electronic coverage of the trial faced a formidable obstacle in the form of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, which states that photographs or radio broadcasts of federal criminal trials "shall not be permitted."

The language of the rule is both absolute and mandatory, meaning that, as a trial judge, Brinkema had no discretion to override it--unless, of course, she was willing to take the audacious course urged upon her by the media intervenors: to declare the rule unconstitutional.

Brinkema conceded that Supreme Court opinions from the 1980s recognize that the public, and by implication the press, have a First Amendment right of access to criminal trials. But that doesn't mean that every individual who might like to attend the trial must be allowed to do so in person, or through "the surrogate of the media. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Banned from the Courtroom: Despite Worldwide Interest, a Federal Judge Rules against Electronic Coverage of the Zacarias Moussaoui Case. (First Amendment Watch)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.