Sludge Mess in EPA's Back Yard: The EPA Tried Some Sleight of Hand by Declaring Sludge Beneficial to the Environment, but the Agency Can't Make Allegations of Poisoning the Public Disappear. (Nation: Government Regulations)

By Cherry, Sheila R. | Insight on the News, March 25, 2002 | Go to article overview

Sludge Mess in EPA's Back Yard: The EPA Tried Some Sleight of Hand by Declaring Sludge Beneficial to the Environment, but the Agency Can't Make Allegations of Poisoning the Public Disappear. (Nation: Government Regulations)


Cherry, Sheila R., Insight on the News


In 1993 the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) attempted to perform "sludge magic," changing its description of the wastewater dregs that settle from households, hospitals, factories and morgues by announcing that, thanks to the agency, this no longer was pollution but beneficial "biosolids." Now these sediments have settled into a mess in EPA's back yard. Everyone from oversight boards to citizen activists is crying foul. Meanwhile, the industry endorsed and created by EPA policy is heavily invested and left to defend itself against the public outcry.

To a casual observer, the controversy over EPA's sewage-sludge-as-fertilizer policy might prompt remarks about the unintended consequences of bureaucratic good intentions. Others might enjoy seeing the self-righteous EPA under scrutiny for polluting the public.

Pointing fingers at the EPA are a skeptical public, government auditors and scientific boards -- all demanding a full accounting of how an agency of environmental protectors arrived at a sludge policy that encourages the spreading of toxic substances on the land. Faced with stubborn air- and water-pollution problems, as well as a 1972 Clean Water Act mandate to stop ocean dumping, an EPA short on resources but thick with regulatory authority did the environmental equivalent of a Hail Mary pass. The EPA began promoting increasing levels of nonpoint pollution -- sewage sludge with nowhere to go -- as a benefit to the environment.

In a 1978 report to Congress titled Sewage Sludge -- How Do We Cope With It?, General Accounting Office (GAO) officials detailed how environmental legislation and rules evolved to create the situation. "Coping with rapidly increasing volumes of sewage sludge, a potentially toxic substance, is a nationwide problem," the GAO warned. That was nearly a quarter of a century ago.

Some methods of sludge disposal already were being phased out because of environmentalist pressure, and others increasingly were restricted by governmental regulations. To compound the problem, the GAO continued, "the lack of scientific data on environmental and health effects of sludge disposal, unproven technology and high costs have hampered development and implementation of new techniques which could use sludge beneficially."

According to the GAO report, disposal of sewage sludge would have been simple if the stuff contained only nutrients. "For example, it could be disposed of in the ocean or used as a fertilizer on land without much of a problem since it would be relatively nontoxic. However, industrial waste discharges into municipal sewer systems can add large amounts of heavy metals and other harmful compounds to the wastewater, increasing the toxicity of sewage sludge and thereby restricting sludge use."

Similarly, in 1983, participants at an EPA workshop on pathogen risks also expressed concern that more science was needed to assess adequately the health impacts associated with land-applied sludge. "Much research has been conducted examining movement of pathogens in soil, especially in context of groundwater contamination. Most of that effort, however, has not focused on biosolids land-application sites. There does not appear to be good, scientifically based guidance to address questions such as minimum depth to groundwater at a biosolids land-application site," the officials indicated.

Furthermore, in a 1990 congressional report on EPA water-pollution efforts in this area, the GAO noted that the information needed to measure EPA's evaluation often was missing. GAO officials reported that this "was aggravated by reductions in environmental monitoring activities and problems with the quality of data that are collected."

But none of those concerns so much as dampened EPA's enthusiasm or stopped it from promoting the "beneficial use of biosolids" in its 1993 regulations based largely on computer models, data from the industry and programs EPA created. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Sludge Mess in EPA's Back Yard: The EPA Tried Some Sleight of Hand by Declaring Sludge Beneficial to the Environment, but the Agency Can't Make Allegations of Poisoning the Public Disappear. (Nation: Government Regulations)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.