Can the Middle Eastern Stalemate Be Broken?

By Benazon, Michael | Midstream, January 2002 | Go to article overview

Can the Middle Eastern Stalemate Be Broken?


Benazon, Michael, Midstream


The effects of the September 11th atrocity have been felt worldwide but nowhere more confusedly than in Israel and Palestine, where people struggle to grasp the implications. Both sides have shifted their tactics, but what is needed is a whole new strategy or approach to the present imbroglio. The Palestinians will have to recognize that they alone cannot force Israel out of the Occupied Territories; that they will not attain their maximal demands; that the other Arab and Muslim countries will not come to their aid; and that a continuation of the practice of suicide bombings and attacks will not advance their cause either in Israel or among the nations who have come to see Islamic fascism as a threat to world order. Equally, it is time for Israelis to acknowledge that they cannot defeat the Intifada, and that they should not prevent the establishment of a viable Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. The reasons are moral, legal, political, geographic, military, and economic.

It is illogical, even perverse, for Israel, which itself became a country within living memory, to deny a statehood worthy of the name to an adjoining people, which possesses a recognized history, language, culture, and land base, and whose grievances and sufferings are in large part attributable to the absence of statehood. Israel has never wanted, and does not want now, a binational or even a pluralistic state. Since Israelis opted for a Jewish homeland, they should not deny the possibility of a similar homeland to their Palestinian neighbors. But the homeland must be viable: it cannot be composed of three or four Bantustans cut off from one another by Israeli roads and settlements.

Israel's long occupation of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip is having an increasingly adverse effect on what, for lack of a better term, may be called Israel's soul. To maintain the occupation, Israel has had to resort to violence and grave violations of human rights, and as a result, it has grown to resemble every other occupying power with unfortunate effects on the way Israel treats its Arab citizens and subjects. It is sad to see an established democracy, guided by the highest of ideals, slowly declining into a society characterized by ethnocentrism, lack of compassion for others, violence, and mistreatment of minorities, as is so often seen in less developed countries.

The legal basis for Israeli and Palestinian statehood was established by the United Nations Partition Plan of 1947, which allowed for two states within the borders of British-mandated Palestine. That the Arab Higher Committee of Palestine, together with the surrounding Arab states, rejected the plan and tried to destroy Israel does not negate the fact that the nations of the world are on record as favoring a two-state solution. As a result of the Arab-Israeli War of 1947-1948, the boundaries of Israel were enlarged into a territory that could be better defended and that could accommodate the millions of Jews who moved to their ancient homeland. The territory set aside for Palestine was occupied in 1948 by Jordan and Egypt and after 1967 by Israel. Consequently, a Palestinian state never came into being. It is not surprising that the Palestinians are frustrated and embittered by their slow progress towards statehood, by continuing Israeli attempts to consolidate and expand new settlements on land that should be part of a Palestinian state, and by the power Israel has to disrupt the everyday lives of local people.

Yet in recent years the Palestinians have made important gains in the political arena. It is not simply the leaders of the United States and Great Britain who favor the establishment of a Palestinian state; it is clear that public opinion in the Western world supports this policy. Indeed, support for an independent viable Palestine grew in the West after September 11, 2001, prompted by the need to persuade Muslim countries to cooperate with the United States in the campaign against Osama Bin Laden and the Al Qaeda network. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Can the Middle Eastern Stalemate Be Broken?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.