Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Thoughts on Reading the Akedah -- Again

By: Bodoff, Lippman | Midstream, January 2002 | Article details

Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

Thoughts on Reading the Akedah -- Again


Bodoff, Lippman, Midstream


The Akedah has played such an important role in Jewish tradition and culture, history, and liturgy, that one is impelled -- even challenged -- to continually rethink its meaning to be sure we have it right. (1)

Doing so, it occurred to me that the secret of this challenge is the paradox that the Akedah presents, that national salvation requires that a cherished son of God, as all of humanity is, must be sacrificed to God. (2) If cherished, why sacrificed; and if sacrificed, in what way cherished?

It then occurred to me that the real paradox of the story may not be in the message but in the means necessary to convey that message -- a very different message -- in a text. If, as I have maintained, the test was, "Will Abraham obey Me with faith that I, God of the universe, will not let the sacrifice of Isaac come to pass," (3) and not "Will Abraham be willing to sacrifice Isaac at My Command," then I would argue -- and here is the paradox -- that it was necessary to portray Abraham as going forward ready to perform the sacrifice! This is so because, if the text instead said something like "And Abraham woke up the next morning (after being commanded to sacrifice Isaac) with faith that God would never, in the end, demand such a sacrifice, because this would not only violate His prior promise to Abraham to father a great nation through Isaac (4) but would run counter to everything that Abraham knew that God stands for and demands of mankind namely, justice, righteousness, and lovingkindness" -- then the text would be putting God on trial for the entire three-day trip to Mount Moriah. During that time, we would know how Abraham feels -- this sacrifice cannot be right, cannot be moral, cannot be what God really wants -- but we would not know where God stands!

Once you introduce the readers, the receivers of the tradition in each generation, to Abraham's inner faith, the story falls apart. We know, Abraham knows, God knows, everybody knows what Abraham believes about this demanded sacrifice, but no one knows yet what God believes, except that He requested it.

Moreover, there is another reason why it is inappropriate to tell the reader or listener, up …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?