True Cities of Culture Do Not Destroy History
Byline: ANDY FOSTER
Sir, - I read the article in Friday's Post on Birmingham's bid to be City of Culture with scepticism. For over 20 years I have been involved in building conservation in this city and to claim such a title at present is quite wrong if the art of architecture is considered part of culture.
In February, city planners approved a new building in New Street in the heart of the Victorian city. The design is uninspired and aggressive. It will ruin the character of the best surviving historic part of the street. It means the demolition of early 19th-century domestic buildings, rare survivals in the city centre, in Temple Street and Needless Alley. The Temple Street buildings step delightfully down the hill. In Needless Alley there is a charming house with an oriel window. Also demolished will be a building in New Street that is currently covered in ugly render but is by one of the finest Victorian architects of the city, WH Ward, designer of the Great Western Arcade and the old Parish Offices in Newhall Street.
Last week, city planners approved a huge scheme in Navigation Street and John Bright Street which will mean the demolition of the fine Victorian building on the corner. It is crucial to the character of John Bright Street, the only surviving Victorian street in this area …
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: True Cities of Culture Do Not Destroy History. Contributors: Not available. Newspaper title: The Birmingham Post (England). Publication date: April 11, 2002. Page number: 10. © 2009 Birmingham Post & Mail Ltd. COPYRIGHT 2002 Gale Group.