Military Tribunals and the War against Terrorism: An Interview with Frank Moran. (Looking at the Law)

By Johnson, Seva | Social Education, March 2002 | Go to article overview

Military Tribunals and the War against Terrorism: An Interview with Frank Moran. (Looking at the Law)


Johnson, Seva, Social Education


The nation has heard much in the news lately about military tribunals. President George W. Bush has authorized military tribunals to try non-U.S. citizens for acts of terrorism against the United States.

Most people don't know what a military tribunal is or how it compares to other courts. I interviewed Frank Moran, executive director of the Boston Bar Association and a retired Air Force colonel, who spent eight years as a military judge and served as chair of the American Bar Association Standing Committee on Armed Forces Law.

What is a military tribunal?

A military tribunal or military commission is a court-like forum that is created within the military to try a person accused of crimes. It is authorized by the U.S. Constitution and the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), which is a federal law (Title 10, United States Code, Chapter 47) passed by Congress. The great majority of the UCMJ is devoted to the rules concerning the trial of U.S. service personnel by court-martial. Article 21, UCMJ, however, provides authority to convene other military tribunals "with respect to offenders or offenses that by statute or by the law of war may be tried by military commissions, provost courts, or other military tribunals."

Courts-martial are different from military tribunals because the law involved and their rules for procedure are well established in the UCMJ and Manual for Courts-Martial It is important to understand, at the outset, that the roles, procedures, and law applying to U.S. courts-martial provide very extensive protections to the rights of the accused, in the same manner as any other court in the United States. Although the president's authority to convene military tribunals derives from the Constitution and the UCMJ, the president has great discretion in developing the rules and procedures of a military tribunal, which may be quite different from those applying to courts-martial.

According to President Bush's order, who might be tried by military tribunal?

On November 13, 2001, President Bush signed an executive order that creates the authority to try non-U.S. citizens by military tribunal where there is reason to believe that the accused is a member of the al Qaeda terrorist group or has engaged in, aided or abetted, or conspired to commit acts of international terrorism, or acts in preparation for terrorism, intended to cause injury to the United States or its citizens, or has knowingly harbored any such persons, and that it is in the interest of the United States that such person be subject to this order.

Military tribunals have historically been conducted to try war criminals. War criminals are typically combatants who violate the law of war, which is a settled body of international law. For example, the most obvious war crime is the intentional killing of noncombatants (civilians). The last time the United States convened military tribunals was during World War II. More than one thousand German war-crime defendants were tried before U.S. Army military tribunals, some of whom were found not guilty, and more than 250 death sentences were carried out. Several countries that Germany occupied also tried German war criminals using their own military tribunals.

How do military tribunals differ from other courts?

A crucial point needs to be made about the authority contained in the UCMJ to convene military tribunals, which makes a significant difference in the answer to your question. Article 36, UCMJ, states that pretrial, trial, and post-trial procedures, including modes of proof, for courts-martial and military tribunals may be prescribed by the president by regulations that shall, so far as he considers practicable, apply the principles of law and rules of evidence generally recognized in the trial of criminal cases in the U.S. district courts.

In Section 1 (F) of his November 13 order, President Bush specifically exercised his prerogative to find that it is not practicable to apply the principles of law and rules of evidence of the U. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Military Tribunals and the War against Terrorism: An Interview with Frank Moran. (Looking at the Law)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.