How Gender and Cognitive Complexity Influence the Provision of Emotional Support: A Study of Indirect Effects

By Samter, Wendy | Communication Reports, Winter 2002 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

How Gender and Cognitive Complexity Influence the Provision of Emotional Support: A Study of Indirect Effects


Samter, Wendy, Communication Reports


The current study examined the extent to which cognitive complexity--a well known predictor of message behavior--mediated sex differences in the production of person-centered comforting messages. Two hundred and eight students (102 men and 106 women) representing a variety of majors at a large midwestern university participated in the study. They responded to Crockett's (1965) Role Category Questionnaire (a measure of cognitive complexity) and three hypothetical situations designed to elicit their levels of comforting ability. Responses to the comforting scenarios were coded for their degree of person-centeredness (Burleson, 1984). Results demonstrated the partial mediating effects of cognitive complexity. However, the effects of sex were large and remained significant even when controlling for complexity.

**********

* Sex is an important variable underlying the attitudes and behaviors relevant to emotional support. Studies suggest that, compared to men, women are more likely to (a) offer support both spontaneously and when requested (e.g., Trobst, Collins, & Embree, 1994); (b) value skills aimed at the management of others' emotions (e.g., Burleson, Kunkel, Samter, & Werking, 1996); and (c) feel confident in their ability to engage in effective support efforts (e.g., Clark, 1993). Consistent with these broader sex differences, at least three studies (e.g., Borden, 1979; Burleson, 1982; Hale, Tighe, & Mongeau, 1997) have found that women are more inclined than men to use highly "person-centered" messages when seeking to comfort a distressed other.

According to constructivist researchers (e.g., Delia, 1987; O'Keefe & Delia, 1982), person-centered messages demonstrate an awareness of and adaptation to the subjective, affective, and relational aspects of communicative contexts. The primary instrumental goal being pursued by interactants determines the particular manner in which person-centeredness is reflected in message strategies (see Burleson & Caplan, 1998). Within comforting situations, a high degree of person-centeredness occurs when speakers explicitly acknowledge, elaborate, and legitimize a distressed other's feelings; person-centered comforting strategies also encourage extended articulation of affective reactions and attempt to place these reactions in a broader context (see Applegate, 1980a, 1980b; Burleson, 1982, 1983). In contrast, position-centered comforting messages disconfirm the emotions experienced because of a distressful event and fail to provide the target with any sort of broader perspective.

The associations between sex and the use of person-centered comforting strategies tend to be moderate in magnitude. For instance, in a study of first-through twelfth-graders, Burleson (1982) reported a small, but significant difference in the highest level comforting strategy males and females produced (approximate d = .50), with females generating messages exhibiting higher levels of person centeredness. More recently, Hale et al. (1997) observed a correlation of .14 between sex and person-centered comforting ability among adults. While somewhat less than substantial in magnitude, such associations are nonetheless important given that a growing body of research indicates that highly person-centered comforting messages are both perceived as more sensitive and effective than less person-centered messages (e.g., Burleson & Samter, 1985), and actually do a better job of relieving emotional distress (Jones & Guerrero, in press). Moreover, several studies indicate that both men and women view person-centered comforting messages as the most sensitive and effective ways of handling emotional distress (Jones & Burleson, 1997; Kunkel & Burleson, 1999; Samter, Burleson, & Murphy, 1987; Samter, Whaley, Mortenson, & Burleson, 1997).

Thus, there is compelling evidence that both sexes regard the person-centered strategies women more commonly produce in situations calling for emotional support to be better ways of managing distress than the less person-centered strategies men more typically utilize.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

How Gender and Cognitive Complexity Influence the Provision of Emotional Support: A Study of Indirect Effects
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?