Two Names Are Better Than One: Trademarks Don't Make Good Internet Domains, and Vice Versa. Why Not Pick a New Name for the Web? (Special Advertising Section)

By Datta, Manjari | American Journalism Review, April 2002 | Go to article overview

Two Names Are Better Than One: Trademarks Don't Make Good Internet Domains, and Vice Versa. Why Not Pick a New Name for the Web? (Special Advertising Section)


Datta, Manjari, American Journalism Review


Arbitrary and fanciful terms tend to be strong trademarks, but they don't tend to be successful as Internet domain names. Trademarks as site names aren't likely to generate a large number of hits--not unless one can engage in a massive advertising campaign and use many descriptive words (called meta tags) to link the site to search engines.

So, one may want to consider a separate trademark and domain name, as long as matching the Web address to the trademark brand is not an imperative.

This could weaken the association between the mark and the domain name. But one may want to consider adopting a descriptive domain name and applying for registration of it on the Supplemental Register. The mark must have been used in connection with commercial sales at the time of filing.

The U.S. Patent and Trademark office has two registers--the Principal Register and the Supplemental Register. In most cases, marks are registered on the Principal Register. Such marks are entitled to all the rights provided by the Trademark Act of 1946. Terms that are descriptive words cannot be on the Principal Register but they can be on the Supplemental Register. (For example, a generic domain name and trademark such as hotjobs.com or drugstore.com may result in many hits to the Web site but would not be entitled to federal trademark registration on the Principal Register, unless the company could show a secondary meaning for those words.)

Marks on the Supplemental Register are not afforded all the benefits of marks that are on the Principal Register. The primary differences between the two are as follows:

* A Principal Registration is prima facie evidence of an exclusive right to use of the mark, but a Supplemental Registration has no such effect.

* A Principal Registration is notice of claim of ownership, but a Supplemental Registration has no such effect.

* While a Principal Registration may become incontestable after five years, a Supplemental Registration can never achieve that status.

* Being listed on the Supplemental Register is not a basis for the Department of the Treasury to stop the importation of infringing products into the United States.

* In litigation where a plaintiff has a Supplemental Registration, the mark will not, prima facie, receive protection as a valid trademark. Its very presence on the Supplemental Register indicates a preliminary determination that the mark is not distinctive. But such a mark may, through use, become distinctive and thus receive protection.

So what's the point of obtaining a Supplemental Registration?

* Suit for infringement of the registered mark can be brought in federal court, along with a related claim of unfair competition. Even though the Supplemental Registration creates no substantive rights, questions of validity, ownership and infringement of these registrations are governed by federal law. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Two Names Are Better Than One: Trademarks Don't Make Good Internet Domains, and Vice Versa. Why Not Pick a New Name for the Web? (Special Advertising Section)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.