Comparative Spatial Filtering in Regression Analysis

By Getis, Arthur; Griffith, Daniel A. | Geographical Analysis, April 2002 | Go to article overview

Comparative Spatial Filtering in Regression Analysis


Getis, Arthur, Griffith, Daniel A., Geographical Analysis


One approach to dealing with spatial autocorrelation in regression analysis involves the filtering of variables in order to separate spatial effects from the variables' total effects. In this paper we compare two filtering approaches, both of which allow spatial statistical analysts to use conventional linear regression models. Getis' filtering approach is based on the autocorrelation observed with the use of the [G.sub.i] local statistic. Griffith's approach uses an eigenfunction decomposition based on the geographic connectivity matrix used to compute a Moran's I statistic. Economic data are used to compare the workings of the two approaches. A final comparison with an autoregressive model strengthens the conclusion that both techniques are effective filtering devices, and that they yield similar regression models. We do note, however, that each technique should be used in its appropriate context.

**********

The need to account for temporal and/or spatial autocorrelation is well known among regression analysts. Many texts on time series detail the way temporal autocorrelation can be identified and modeled. The literature on spatial autocorrelation is less well developed. One approach to dealing with spatial autocorrelation in regression analysis involves filtering, which seeks to undertake data analyses within the context of the study of stochastic error characteristic of time series analysis. In time series analysis, ARIMA and impulse-response functions are often employed to filter autocorrelation. In the spatial domain, Haining (1991), for example, shows that the temporal-type filtering approach is equivalent to a spatial autocorrelation adjustment for the case of bivariate correlation. This paper compares two additional filtering approaches, both of which allow spatial statistical analysts to use conventional linear regression models in which parameters are estimated by ordinary least squares (OLS). It outline s the mechanics of filtering, leaving a researcher to conceptually establish the underlying source of spatial autocorrelation (for example, spatial process, misspecification).

1. SPATIAL FILTERING AND SPATIAL AUTOREGRESSION

The motivation for this type of work is to allow spatial analysts to employ traditional linear regression techniques while insuring that regression residuals behave according to required model assumptions, such as uncorrelated errors. When georeferenced data are used, residuals are assumed not to be spatially autocorrelated; otherwise the regression model is said to be misspecified. Least squares estimators of intercept and slope parameters offer a considerable advantage over other estimators. OLS regression is simpler than generalized least squares regression, has a well-developed theory, and has available a battery of diagnostic statistics that make interpretations easy and straightforward.

Of the approaches used to include spatial effects in regression analyses, the most often cited is the family of autoregressive models of the general form discussed by Anselin (1988) and Griffith (1988). In essence, these models depend on one or more spatial structural matrices that account for spatial autocorrelation in the georeferenced data from which model parameters are estimated. The spatial autocorrelation devices are constructed from geographic weights matrices, which are used to capture the covariation among values of one or more random variables that are associated with the configuration of areal units. Spatial autoregressive models almost exclusively assume normality, and are nonlinear in nature. For these models, it is inappropriate to use OLS estimation procedures for model development and testing. In this paper, our procedures identify the spatial and nonspatial components of georeferenced variables that make up the OLS regression model. The spatial autoregressive model, on the other hand, essent ially supplies global measures of spatial dependence without uncovering individual spatial and nonspatial component contributions.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Comparative Spatial Filtering in Regression Analysis
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.