Litigation over Medical Negligence: We Need a Civil System to Right a Human Error; Gareth Thomas MP, Labour Member of Parliament for Clwyd West, Has Secured a Debate on Clinical Negligence in Parliament Today. the MP, Who Is Also a Barrister, Argues That the Current System of Compensating the Victims of Medical Mishaps Is in Need of Urgent Reform

Western Mail (Cardiff, Wales), May 15, 2002 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Litigation over Medical Negligence: We Need a Civil System to Right a Human Error; Gareth Thomas MP, Labour Member of Parliament for Clwyd West, Has Secured a Debate on Clinical Negligence in Parliament Today. the MP, Who Is Also a Barrister, Argues That the Current System of Compensating the Victims of Medical Mishaps Is in Need of Urgent Reform


Byline: Gareth Thomas

AS a society we rightly expect and normally receive a high standard of care and treatment from the medical profession. However, accidents do happen, and when it can be established that a medical mishap is due to the negligence of a doctor or medical team member, our law has always provided a remedy via the tort of negligence. The cost of clinical negligence claims has increased greatly in recent years. For the year 2001/02 the NHS in England faced accumulated claims of pounds 4.4bn - a rise of pounds 500m over 2000. In Wales the accounting system is different. The National Assembly NHS (Wales) Summarised Accounts for 2000/01 showed a total liability of pounds 126.7m based on claims where there is a ``probable chance of the claim being settled''. This figure excludes disputed claims of some pounds 218m.

The trend has been upwards but the rate of growth has declined, in part due to steps taken by the NHS through the Welsh Risk Pool to manage risk and develop systems to prevent what health professionals call euphemistically ``adverse healthcare events'' - misdiagnosis, wrong or faulty use of anaesthetic, damage to organs in surgery, or inap propriate administering of drugs.

Many claims are settled for modest sums. The patient receives an explanation and an apology. But more serious cases can take many years to settle, and our adversarial system presents a real obstacle course for all but for the most tenacious claimant.

A 57-year-old constituent of mine recently received some pounds 2m for brain damage she sustained during childbirth 15 years earlier. The solicitor who represented her told me it was a ``titanic struggle''. It took four years to secure an admission of liability and throughout the family had to fight tooth and nail with lawyers on the other side to secure a fair settlement. The costs were considerable and, in the words of the family, ``What should have been a joyous family event was a living nightmare made even worse by having to fight all the way for every penny.''

In the debate I have secured in the House of Commons today, I will argue that although the costs of clinical negligence have increased dramatically we should not blame the lawyers. Nor do I believe it is possible to develop a ``no-fault'' compensation scheme. Those that have been introduced in New Zealand, Sweden and Finland will still require the claimant to prove fault, and operation of the schemes has been very expensive causing Governments to cut down on eligibility.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Litigation over Medical Negligence: We Need a Civil System to Right a Human Error; Gareth Thomas MP, Labour Member of Parliament for Clwyd West, Has Secured a Debate on Clinical Negligence in Parliament Today. the MP, Who Is Also a Barrister, Argues That the Current System of Compensating the Victims of Medical Mishaps Is in Need of Urgent Reform
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?