An "Imagination of Order": The Suspicion of Structure in Anthropology and Poetry

By Maynard, Kent | The Antioch Review, Spring 2002 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

An "Imagination of Order": The Suspicion of Structure in Anthropology and Poetry

Maynard, Kent, The Antioch Review

In writing ethnography, anthropologists generally assume they are describing a society and reaching some explanatory conclusions, however tentative. Poets, too, observe and offer explanations for what they see around them. This may include more references to their own "internal" imagination or to nature, however socially shaped these are, but poetry like anthropology looks at everyday experience. In this essay, I ask a question: to what degree does this shared gaze, ratcheted down on experience, draw poetry and ethnography, poetics and anthropology closer together?

I focus on contemporary American anthropology and poetry. Observers like Marjorie Perloff in Poetic License note that British poetry, as one example, is more receptive to received forms, that rhyme and meter enjoy preeminence less typical of American poetry since Walt Whitman and especially since World War II. Romanticism and Puritanism retain their sway in American poetry, in part because of their shared emphasis on individualism. Likewise, it should not be surprising--though few social theorists comment on it--that American anthropology is more interested in the personal and more influenced by post-modernism than is British social anthropology. The degree to which British anthropologists focus on institutional analysis or the nuanced rules of kinship can be disconcerting to American anthropologists more enamored of interactionist, cultural, or postmodern accounts.

Although the obvious differences between American ethnography and poetry have seemed, until now at least, to outweigh the similarities, both betray a growing disquiet about received tradition, of an abstract, coherent model of culture and other structures, as well as "traditional" (cultural) poetic forms or ethnographic writing styles. In Twentieth Century Pleasures, Robert Hass sees the iamb--the double syllabic foot, short and long, unaccented and accented, at the core of so much classical poetry--as an "imagined order" that has fallen into disfavor:

The pure iamb in fact can't be rendered; it only exists as a felt principle of order, beneath all possible embodiments, in the mind of the listener. It exists in silence, is invisible, unspeakable. An imagination of order. A music of the spheres .... [But] in the course of about a hundred years, the printing press tore the lyric poem away from music and left the poet with the sound of his own voice.

So, too, social theorists have turned suspicious of terms like "structure," "system," or "culture." In The Predicament of Culture James Clifford sees the concept of culture as pure invention and equally untrustworthy: "The concept of culture used by anthropologists was, of course, invented by European theorists.... For all its supposed relativism ... the concept's model of totality, basically organic in structure, was not different from the nineteenth-century concepts it replaced...."

Especially with the impact of post-modernism, poets and ethnographers have shied away from coherent cultural "worldviews." They have discarded analyses of abstract symbols or the use of received forms of writing-criticized as hegemonic or privileged-for looser writing styles and a preoccupation with experience. For poets this often begins with personal experience. For ethnographers, the personal too is coming to the fore; in the jargon of the times, the "I" is less "de-centered." But these days, anthropologists also focus on social practice generally, what people are actually doing.

While this shift toward experience has many salutary benefits, it also gives us an impoverished view of culture, one limited to the knowledge or imagery imminent in experience. Missing is the profound human capacity for spinning transcendent cultural visions about the world, coherent, abstract, essentialist to be sure, but cultural accounts that have enormous power and emotional investment.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

An "Imagination of Order": The Suspicion of Structure in Anthropology and Poetry


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?