1970s Stop-Gap Measure Still Makes Us Better off; John Adams Explains Why the Barnett Formula for Regional Spending Still Works in Wales's Favour

Western Mail (Cardiff, Wales), May 20, 2002 | Go to article overview

1970s Stop-Gap Measure Still Makes Us Better off; John Adams Explains Why the Barnett Formula for Regional Spending Still Works in Wales's Favour


Byline: John Adams

THE latest figures for spending in the United Kingdom demonstrate that there are still much higher levels of spending in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland than in England. Furthermore, the gap does not yet seem to be closing.

During the devolution process of the 1970s the Barnett formula was devised to allocate increases in public spending between the different nations of the United Kingdom. Named after the then Chief Secretary to the Treasury Joel Barnett, the formula was intended to end the annual negotiations between the Treasury and the devolved administrations. In this goal, it succeeded.

Intended as a stop-gap measure, the Barnett formula was to be replaced by a formula which reflected the different needs of the different countries of the UK. As devolution never became a reality in the 1970s, the Barnett formula remained. It was expected that the formula also would bring, over time, the levels of spending in Scotland, Wales and England more closely into line. It did not achieve this.

One reason cited to explain this failure is that the population of Scotland was falling relative to the rest of the UK, and that the formula calculations did not reflect this. While at the Treasury in the early 1990s Michael Portillo decided to update the formula to take account of any population changes, and four years ago Labour decided to make this an annual event. This appears to be having little effect.

The latest figures for 2000-2001 seem toconfirm that this situation is not changing. The headline figures show that spending in Scotland is some 18pc above the UK average (23pc above England). Spending in Wales is 13pc higher, and in Northern Ireland the figure is 36pc.

If social security is taken out of the calculations the differences are starker. The remaining spending is a better indicator of provision for front-line services. Once this calculation is made, spending in Scotland would be 23pc above the UK average. In Wales spending would be 11pc higher, and in Northern Ireland 46pc.

It is true that, as they start from initially higher levels, the increases in spending in Scotland and Wales in the period 1999-2000 to 2000-20001 are less than in England. Total identifiable spending increased in England by 5.8pc, but in Scotland the figure was 5.5pc and in Wales 4.7pc. Northern Ireland saw a 8.3pc increase. However, the differences in spending levels between the three countries has remained fairly constant over time. The five financial years from 1996 to 2001 show that each country remains within a band of one or two percentage points.

Interestingly, the figures for spending within England between the nine English regions seem much more volatile. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

1970s Stop-Gap Measure Still Makes Us Better off; John Adams Explains Why the Barnett Formula for Regional Spending Still Works in Wales's Favour
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.