Campaign Finance 'Reform'

By Samples, John | The World and I, May 2002 | Go to article overview

Campaign Finance 'Reform'


Samples, John, The World and I


Congress has recently passed extensive new restrictions on campaign finance. The proponents of these new limits--Reps. Christopher Shays (R-Connecticut) and Martin Meehan (D-Massachusetts), along with Sens. John McCain (R-Arizona) and Russell Feingold (D-Wisconsin)--say their law will clean up and reform American politics. The new law--dubbed Shays-Meehan--has two major provisions: a ban on "soft money" and restrictions on broadcast advertising. Far from reforming American politics, these restrictions ensure the continuation of the status quo and its powers-that-be: incumbent officeholders and the establishment media.

THE BASICS

For most of our history, Americans have enjoyed a relatively unregulated system of campaign finance. These freedoms, like many others, began to erode in the 1960s and early 1970s as powerful groups pushed restrictions on the right to spend money on political advocacy.

In 1974, Congress passed the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA), which set tight limits on overall campaign spending, imposed ceilings on contributions, continued existing prohibitions on contributions from corporations and labor unions in federal elections, and established government funding of presidential campaigns. The law was immediately challenged as a violation of the rights of Americans.

The Supreme Court's decision in Buckley v. Valeo in 1976 partially struck down FECA. The majority set forth the tight connection between freedom of speech and money:

"Virtually every means of communicating ideas in today's mass society requires the expenditure of money. The distribution of the humblest handbill or leaflet entails printing, paper, and circulation costs. Speeches and rallies generally necessitate hiring a hall and publicizing the event. The electorate's increasing dependence on television, radio, and other mass media for news and information has made these expensive modes of communication indispensable instruments of effective political speech."

Limits on political spending thus limit political speech "by restricting the number of issues discussed, the depth of their exploration, and the size of the audience reached." Any limits on political spending, the Court concluded, violated the First Amendment.

The tight link between money and speech would appear to apply to all political spending, including campaign outlays and contributions. After all, if I give money to a candidate, I'm expressing a position on politics and policy.

However, the Buckley decision did not give campaign contributions the same First Amendment protections it afforded other spending on politics. Contributions could be limited, the justices said, to advance the state's compelling interest in preventing "corruption or the appearance of corruption." With these concepts in hand, we can judge Shays-Meehan.

SOFT MONEY

Hard money comprises campaign contributions regulated by the FECA. Soft money has not been regulated by federal law until now. In the late 1970s, Congress and the Federal Election Commission exempted soft money contributions to the political parties, which they could spend on voter registration, some campaign materials, and voter turnout programs. Far from a nefarious loophole in election law, soft money began life as an attempt to strengthen the parties and raise voter turnout.

Debates about soft money necessarily concern large sums that are often labeled "obscene" by those seeking new regulations. The total soft money raised in the 2000 election--$490 million--is a large sum in anyone's book. Yet absolute numbers easily mislead. Campaign spending in general, and soft money specifically, pale beside the $2.5 trillion spent by federal, state, and local governments annually. The soft money total for 2000 is less than $3 per eligible voter in the United States. Moreover, soft money accounts for only 15 percent of all money spent on campaigns. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Campaign Finance 'Reform'
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.