Lacson Cites Supreme Court ruling.(Main News)

Manila Bulletin, May 29, 2002 | Go to article overview

Lacson Cites Supreme Court ruling.(Main News)


Byline: GABRIEL S. MABUTAS

Sen. Panfilo Lacson claimed victory yesterday in the ruling of the Supreme Court remanding his case to the Quezon City Regional Trial Court for decision on a petition of the Department of Justice (DoJ) to reopen the murder case against him and 37 other police officers for their alleged involvement in 1995 Kuratong Baleleng case.

He said the High Tribunal upheld their point that the prescriptive period for rendering a trial court's decision on criminal cases such as theirs is two years.

The Department of Justice (DoJ), through the Office of the Solicitor General, had earlier argued before the High Court that the case could still be revived since criminal cases similar to that of the Kuratong Baleleng have a prescriptive period of 20 years.

Its argument formed part of their appeal to reverse an earlier ruling of a Court of Appeals special division, which declared a Quezon City Regional Trial Court's dismissal of the cases against Lacson and others, final.

The Appellate Court held that the prescriptive period for appeal of criminal cases is two years.

"I just don't understand why Justice Secretary (Hernando) Perez claims victory in the decision when we were the ones who scored in the legal battle," Lacson said.

He said the Supreme Court decided the case fairly when it clarified that the Amended Rules of Court on Criminal Procedure applies to his case.

Section 8, Rule 117, the senator stressed, provides for a two-year prescriptive period for appeal of a criminal case before the finality of a trial court's decision.

Lacson explained that the Supreme Court remanded the case to the trial court and ordered it to determine if all the requirements for the prescription period have been met to make its decision final.

"Now, we will just have to prove that the requirements have been met, and show that the prescriptive period had started and finally lapsed before the DoJ moved for the revival of the case against me. The trial court decided the case sometime between March 27 to 29, 1999, and the prosecution tried to revive it only in April 2001, when the prescriptive period had already expired," he said.

Lacson also defended his political allies for criticizing the Supreme Court earlier for its decision, saying they just failed to get accurate information on it.

Senate President Franklin Drilon, for his part, branded the SC decision a "cop-out", saying "it did not resolve anything."

"By throwing back the issue to the Quezon City Regional Trial Court, the High Court did not live up to its role as the final arbiter of legal issues.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Lacson Cites Supreme Court ruling.(Main News)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.