Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

The Roles and Rules of Law in Sexual Development

By: Levesque, Roger J. R. | The Journal of Sex Research, February 2002 | Article details

Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

The Roles and Rules of Law in Sexual Development


Levesque, Roger J. R., The Journal of Sex Research


How individuals and society approach sexuality and sexual behavior necessitates a close look at how the legal system formally regulates individuals and seeks to foster certain dispositions. The law regulates sexual behavior and development in numerous and complicated ways. The law regulates sexuality through three major legal paradigms: criminal law, civil law, and child welfare law. These paradigms are enforced at three different levels of jurisdiction: local, state, and federal law. In mm, these paradigms and levels derive from three different sources: case law, legislative law, and constitutional law. All of these paradigms, sources and levels of jurisdiction provide the foundation for analyzing how the law controls sexual behavior. Given the complexity of laws, no compendium has yet to examine the numerous types of laws, the effectiveness of such laws, and how laws regulate sexuality throughout the entire life-span. This brief overview necessarily focuses on general legal trends. To do so, the analysis separates the regulation of sexuality to focus on the extent to which the law controls factors influencing sexual activity, attitudes, and related behaviors.

REGULATING SOCIAL INFLUENCES ON SEXUALITY

Understanding how the law influences the development, attitudes, and outcomes of sexuality requires beginning with the central factors often identified as highly influential: families, schools, media, and service provision. These factors are all the subject of considerable regulation, and even have contributed to the development of cases eventually decided by the Supreme Court. Although the regulations increasingly result in settled doctrine, it is important to emphasize that other factors are emerging as important to consider (such as group factors involving, for example, religious and cultural concerns) and that those factors are now being addressed more systematically by the legal system. Although much may remain to be determined, we can nevertheless discern important trends and developments that certainly will guide and be reflected in future efforts.

Family

Law partly regulates sexuality through its regulation of family life. That regulation generally treats adults and children differently. The law generally views children as belonging to their parents and protects the parental right to control the upbringing of their children. This generally allows parents to control their children's rights, ranging from the parents' general right to control information their children receive, their children's associations with others, and their children's activities (Levesque, 2000a). The law generally treats adult family members as separate individuals (Levesque, 2000a). Yet, the law still allows adults considerable freedom to control the rights of others, so long as the others are willing. The difference between children and adult family members' rights become most obvious when conflict (or potential conflict) between family members arises. The different rights of children and adults result, for example, in granting adults greater power to exercise the right to access contraceptives, receive abortions, raise children, and gain direct access to medical treatment and social services for matters relating to sexual activity, behavior, and relationships.

Although parents and adults within families possess considerable rights, the rights are not without their limits. The state's two broad powers allow it to intervene in families (for a review see Levesque, 2000a). The parens patriae power allows the state to act as parents would when parents fail to perform their duties or allows the state to act in a manner that supports parents (e.g., by permitting the use of curfews, limiting access to sexualized materials and services, and requiring parental permission to receive certain medical treatments). The state's police power allows it to intervene to protect both minors and adults. That power authorizes the state to act as protector of the community--to make laws to protect the public health, safety, welfare, and morals. It is through this power, for example, that states may enact criminal laws to protect family members from victimization (Levesque, 2002a). Both of these powers provide important limits on the extent to which families may act freely in influencing other members' sexual development, behavior, and attitudes.

The …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?