Global Constitutionalism and the Arguments over Free Trade

By Bruner, M. Lane | Communication Studies, Spring 2002 | Go to article overview

Global Constitutionalism and the Arguments over Free Trade

Bruner, M. Lane, Communication Studies

In one of the most dramatic public demonstrations since the end of the Vietnam War, more than 40,000 citizens filled the streets of Seattle, Washington in the closing weeks of the twentieth century to protest against the World Trade Organization (WTO) and corporate globalization. The protesters' main claim was that the values and policies guiding corporate managed globalization were actively eroding the security and well being of the world community. In their massive sit-in on November 30, protesters blocked major downtown intersections, interrupting the opening of discussions between trade ministers from around the globe. Tensions were high, especially after early skirmishes with police prompted self-proclaimed anarchists to break away from the otherwise peaceful protesters and begin vandalizing transnational corporate businesses such as McDonalds, Starbucks, Old Navy, and Niketown. Vandalism soon escalated into violence as police used tear gas and pepper-spray to clear the streets. Under pressure from federal authorities, Seattle police, joined later by National Guard troops, enforced a dawn to dusk curfew on the city's downtown area, creating an unprecedented "50 block protest free zone," thus ensuring that the meetings would go ahead as scheduled the following day (Dority, 2000; Egan, 1999; Gorov, 1999; Hunter, 1999; Sanger, 1999; Verhovek and Greenhouse, 1999). Across the country, newspapers and television stations shared graphic images of civil unrest unseen in the United States for decades. There indeed had been a battle in Seattle.

The conflict caught many citizens by surprise, occurring as it did during a period of extended peace and prosperity. What could possibly be so wrong with the country, or with the WTO, that a major city could explode in protest? What were the various positions of those involved in the dispute and what were they fighting about? What was the WTO anyway? In what follows, I investigate these and other questions about the globalization process by outlining the various arguments for and against contemporary globalization policy. Despite the average citizen's confusion about the events in Seattle, the struggle between free trade advocates and their opponents is an old and important one. Karl Marx, for example, wrote a speech "On the Question of Free Trade" in 1848 in response to the repeal of the Corn Laws in England (Marx, 1906). The repeal of the protectionist Corn Laws established agricultural free trade in 1846 and exemplified the free trade thinking that dominated British economic philosophy until the 1930s. Marx argued that "free trade" was a ruse of the propertied class to increase the freedom of oppressive capital, not the freedom of democratic individuals (pp. 206-207). While the debate has gone through several rounds in the intervening years among experts, contemporary public arguments involve an unprecedented range of relatively informed constituencies coalesced around a fairly concise set of arguments for and against corporate globalization. While the broad public may be uninformed, they are more informed than they used to be.

The events in Seattle, then, can best be viewed as one of the most recent battles in the ongoing policy wars between free trade advocates in the government and their growing base of adversaries in the public sphere. The battle in Seattle was arguably prompted in no small part by an earlier campaign, led in 1997 by Ralph Nader's Public Citizen, against a proposed Multilateral Agreement on Investments (MAI). The anti-MAI campaign galvanized a wide range of labor, environmental, and human rights activists to fight what they collectively saw as an attempt by corporations to gain nothing less than geo-political supremacy over the nation-state system (Barlow & Clarke, 1998). They won this round when the MAI was later tabled. Turning their attention to the world trade talks in Seattle, political activists from over 800 non-government organizations (NGOs) from over seventy-five countries called for "resistance to the growing power of corporate greed" and the "social degradation of the process of globalization without social control" engendered by the policies of the WTO, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and the World Bank (Tabb, 2000; Hunter, 1999, p. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Global Constitutionalism and the Arguments over Free Trade


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.