The Final Chapters of Ruiz V. Estelle. (Judicial News)

By Reynolds, Carl | Corrections Today, June 2002 | Go to article overview

The Final Chapters of Ruiz V. Estelle. (Judicial News)


Reynolds, Carl, Corrections Today


In 1972, inmate David Ruiz filed a handwritten lawsuit against the Texas Department of Corrections (TDC), which was destined to become the most far-reaching prison conditions litigation in American history. It is likely that this epic case will come to complete closure on July 1; this article provides a retrospective of the "endgame."

The 1996 Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) has been the pervasive theme of the past several years: Texas' efforts to invoke the act's consent decree section to end court jurisdiction, the district court's resistance to validity and mandate of the act, and the appellate court's enforcement of the act.

The original (1980) reported decision in Ruiz described the case's early stages: The civil action began in June 1972, when Ruiz filed suit against the TDC director, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief for alleged violations of his constitutional rights. During spring 1974, the civil action instituted by Ruiz was consolidated with the suits of seven other TDC inmates into a single civil action, styled Ruiz v. Estelle, 550 F.2d 238. Counsel was appointed to represent the indigent plaintiffs and the United States was ordered to appear in the case as amicus curiae (friend of the court). That December, the motion of the United States to intervene as a plaintiff was granted, and the addition of Texas Board of Corrections members as defendants also was allowed. A further order was entered that permitted the action to be maintained as a class action. Plaintiffs have challenged the following aspects of confinement in TDC prisons: crowding, security and supervision, health care, discipline, access to the courts a nd other general confinement conditions.

After decades of litigation and reform, reams of stipulations and decrees were reduced to a brief final judgment in 1992. Many issues were closed out and others were the subject of only global mandates, such as to maintain and enforce certain policies, e.g., use of force and to "employ sufficient trained security and non-security staff."

Persistent criticism of the continuation of any court oversight seemingly led Attorney General Dan Morales in March 1996 to file a motion to terminate the final judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which is the generic provision for obtaining relief from a judgment that has been entered. One month later, Congress enacted PLRA, which affects prison conditions litigation by requiring: that the district court find that the existing prospective relief "remains necessary to correct a current and ongoing violation of [a] federal right and that the prospective relief is narrowly drawn and the least intrusive means to correct the violation"; immediate termination of prospective relief such as the final judgment; a prompt ruling on motions for relief, requiring an automatic stay of prospective relief unless the district court finds that relief remains necessary to correct a current or ongoing constitutional violation; and automatic termination of decrees on PLRA's second anniversary.

In September 1996, the attorney general filed a motion to terminate pursuant to PLRA, and later that month, federal Judge William Wayne Justice ruled that the automatic stay provision is unconstitutional; that section provided that a prison condition consent decree automatically was stayed after a defined period of time from the filing of the motion to terminate the decree. In July 1997, the attorney general withdrew the Rule 60(b) motion, seeking termination only under PLRA.

In August 1997, the 5th Circuit denied the state's attempt to mandamus (a writ commanding that a specific thing be done, issued by a higher court to a lower one) Justice to rule on the motion to terminate, and held that the district court was entitled to an updated record on the remaining substantive issues that were still relevant under the final judgment.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Final Chapters of Ruiz V. Estelle. (Judicial News)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.