Special Series Part II-Education in Action: An Evaluation of the Endangered Species Act and Private Landowner Assurances

By Cummings, Bridget; Mathews, Nancy E. | Endangered Species Update, March-April 2002 | Go to article overview

Special Series Part II-Education in Action: An Evaluation of the Endangered Species Act and Private Landowner Assurances


Cummings, Bridget, Mathews, Nancy E., Endangered Species Update


Editor's Note

The UPDATE presents a three-part series of educational essays from Nancy Mathews' Wildlife Ecology class at the University of Wisconsin. We are presenting a selection of position papers regarding Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act. This educational exercise is an example of how the next generation of conservation biologists is being trained. In particular, the essay set reflects an emphasis on remaining sensitive to the perspectives of multiple stakeholders. Perhaps some novel ideas are embedded in these essays as well, as fresh eyes often bring new insights to old controversies.

Wildlife Ecology students were given sample Habitat Conservation Plans and were instructed to assume the identity of the associated landowner, who also happened to be a trained wildlife biologist. The role-playing assignment was then given as follows:

Please write a position paper to be presented at a Senate sub-committee hearing on reauthorization of the Endangered Species Act. Support or refute the intent of the Section 10 administrative policies that attempt to make conservation planning more palatable to private property owners. Give a brief overview of the policies and present the pros and cons of the private landowner assurances. Support your position using what you have learned in class, the Endangered Species Act, and the assigned Habitat Conservation Plan.

Introduction

Good afternoon. My name is Bridget Cummings. I am a private landowner in Austin, Texas, with a holding of five acres. In December of 2000, I received an Incidental Take Permit from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) for the Houston toad (Bufo houstonensis). I am in the process of developing 0.5 acres of my land for a new home that will result in a taking of Houston toad habitat. I also have been a wildlife biologist with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department for the past six years. Based on my personal and professional experiences, I believe I am qualified to speak with authority when I say that the recent Section 10 policies of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) adopted by the FWS adequately address the rights of private landowners, while insuring the protection of species against extinction. I am here today to speak in support of the reauthorization of the ESA, including the Section 10 amendments.

The controversy over reauthorization of the ESA involves two major players: (1) private landowners and the wise use movement, and (2) species conservation and environmental groups. The debates were sparked by Section 9 of the ESA, which states that it is illegal "to ... take ... any species." According to the ESA, "take" means "to harass, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, trap, kill, capture, collect, or attempt to do such." The wise use movement has challenged the constitutionality of the ESA based on the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment in the Bill of Rights, which states, "... nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." Because Section 9 of the ESA curtails private landowners' activities and development rights on their land, the wise use movement views the prohibited acts of Section 9 as a taking of their land "without just compensation."

As an initial response to the private landowners' complaints, the FWS amended the ESA in 1982, allowing for the issuance of Incidental Take Permits through the implementation of Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs). Nonetheless, growing dissatisfaction with the restrictions placed on private landowners created a more powerful and vocal force behind the wise use movement. In the late 1990s, the FWS incorporated the new Section 10 amendments into the ESA in order to forge a creative partnership between private landowners and the FWS, or more accurately, economic development and rare species' protection.

Section 10(a)(1)(A) established Candidate Conservation Agreements (CCAs) and Enhancement of Survival Permits with Safe Harbors agreements.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Special Series Part II-Education in Action: An Evaluation of the Endangered Species Act and Private Landowner Assurances
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.