WRONG Review of Peterhead Prison Was Fundamentally Flawed from Start WRONG It Failed to Use the Correct Figures or Ask the Relevant Questions WRONG the Evidence of the Prisons Chief Was Incomplete and Inaccurate WRONG Nothing to Back Up Claims That Private Jails Would Save Millions; DON'T CELL OUT PETERHEAD

Daily Record (Glasgow, Scotland), July 3, 2002 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

WRONG Review of Peterhead Prison Was Fundamentally Flawed from Start WRONG It Failed to Use the Correct Figures or Ask the Relevant Questions WRONG the Evidence of the Prisons Chief Was Incomplete and Inaccurate WRONG Nothing to Back Up Claims That Private Jails Would Save Millions; DON'T CELL OUT PETERHEAD


Byline: DAVE KING

THE decision to close Peterhead Prison was yesterday slated as flawed from the start.

A damning report backed the Daily Record's campaign to keep the world-renowned jail open.

It also slammed plans by the Scottish Executive to build three new private prisons.

The report, by a cross-party committee of MSPs, blasted the planned shake-up of Scottish jails and said the Executive should go back to the drawing board.

It said the review, championed by Justice Minister Jim Wallace, was fundamentally flawed from the start.

The wrong questions had been asked, wrong figures were used and the wrong conclusions had been reached.

The Justice 1 Committee dismissed Executive claims that the private prisons plan would save pounds 700million.

And they were particularly scathing about Scottish Prison Service Chief Executive Tony Cameron.

They sparked calls for his resignation by branding his evidence "extraordinary, unconvincing" and "astonishing".

Committee convener Christine Grahame said: "Our investigation found that the Executive's review was based on inadequate financial and performance information, making accurate comparisons between private and public provision almost impossible.

"We believe they need to look again at the evidence before making any significant changes to the way in which prisons are run in Scotland."

The Record revealed last month that, following a public outcry, the Executive were planning a U-turn on their plans to close Peterhead in Aberdeenshire, which houses a pioneering treatment centre for sex offenders.

Last night, Wallace still wouldn't come out and admit the jail would be kept open. But he did agree to have "further dialogue" about the plans.

The Justice 1 Committee had a long list of complaints about the Executive's plans.

They found no evidence to back claims that massive savings would be made through building private jails.

The MSPs also said the review should have looked into the option of having privately built prisons run by the state.

The report said: "The committee is concerned that the estates review has not adequately explored the option of privately built, publicly operated prisons or not-for-profit trusts."

And there was criticism that the Executive had made their decision to build three new jails "in a vacuum".

They had not taken account of future changes in sentencing policy or how their push towards alternatives to custody would affect the situation.

Convener Grahame added: "If one is looking at the prospect for the prisons estate for the next 25 years, it would seem basic to look at prison reform and to look at reducing prison numbers through penal reform and alternatives to custody."

There was more woe for Wallace over his plans to limit the numbers at Barlinnie in Glasgow to 530, with the committee worried that it may lead to overcrowding.

Lib Dem MSP Donald Gorrie said the review had been based on wrong assumptions.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

WRONG Review of Peterhead Prison Was Fundamentally Flawed from Start WRONG It Failed to Use the Correct Figures or Ask the Relevant Questions WRONG the Evidence of the Prisons Chief Was Incomplete and Inaccurate WRONG Nothing to Back Up Claims That Private Jails Would Save Millions; DON'T CELL OUT PETERHEAD
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?