Federal Innovation Policy Can Help-And Hurt-Economy, Economists Say. (Perspectives: News and Views of the Current Research * Technology Management Scene)

By Norling, Parry | Research-Technology Management, July-August 2002 | Go to article overview

Federal Innovation Policy Can Help-And Hurt-Economy, Economists Say. (Perspectives: News and Views of the Current Research * Technology Management Scene)


Norling, Parry, Research-Technology Management


Inconsistent actions by the U.S. government to promote competition and economic growth can actually hinder innovation and economic prosperity, according to five economists who offered examples and some remedies at the third annual "Innovation Policy and the Economy" conference in Washington, D.C. The April 16 meeting was sponsored by the National Bureau of Economic Research (www.nber.org).

Joshua Lerner, Harvard University, has studied impacts on innovation from boom and bust in the venture capital industry. Although investment activity has been cut in half in the past few quarters with no revival in sight, Lerner finds the situation not so grim. On average, venture capital has a powerful impact on innovation, with one venture capital dollar as effective as three industrial R&D dollars. However, the impact is not uniform. During booms, over-funding of favorite sectors leads to a sharp decline in effectiveness. During the 1998-2000 boom for example, 39 percent of funding was concentrated in Internet investments. Considerable sums supported similar firms such as the nine competing Internet pet food suppliers. Meanwhile, promising areas in advanced materials, energy technologies, and micromanufacturing languished unfunded. Even so, while potentially good investments go unfunded in prolonged downturns, many dire predictions seem overstated, Lerner said.

Lerner further argued that while the rise of venture capital has been an important contributor to technological innovation and economic prosperity, an effective policy agenda should not simply seek to spur venture financing. This just adds to the problem. Instead, Federal and state policies should encourage private investment, address funding gaps by supporting out-of-favor industrial segments, and focus on demand rather than supply--creating investment opportunities.

Examples would include facilitating commercialization of early-stage technology, such as the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986, both of which eased entrepreneurs' ability to access early-stage research. Similarly, efforts to make entrepreneurship more attractive through tax policy (capital gains rates) may have a substantial impact on the amount of venture capital provided and the returns that these investments may yield.

IP vs. Antitrust

Intellectual property policy conveys market power to innovators while antitrust policy constrains it. This creates a fundamental conflict for R&D-intensive industries. Dennis Carlton, University of Chicago, studied this clash, assessing whether and how antitrust policy should promote competition in situations where market power depends on success from intensive R&D. The U.S. Department of Justice has blocked at least one merger on the basis of an anticipated reduction in innovation in a market where competitive position is primarily determined in the R&D lab. Given the fallacy of using potential restraint of R&D for such antitrust actions, this approach should not be used again, he maintained.

In another argument, Carlton pointed out how competitive advantage can be maintained by marketing closed rather than open systems. A closed system has components (such as a home entertainment system with DVD/CD player, speakers, TV, remote controller, and FM radio; or a suite of computer programs for word processing, e-mail, presentations, and web access) that are compatible with one another; no component can be replaced by a similar component from another manufacturer. An open system would be one where the consumer could mix and match components from many manufacturers.

In some situations, possibly unfair market power may have been obtained by the development of the closed system and there would be greater benefits for the consumer from a similar open system. But rather than trying to use the antitrust laws to attack the maintenance of such closed systems, Carlton carefully argued that intellectual property laws and regulations can indeed promote open systems and the standards-setting organizations they require.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Federal Innovation Policy Can Help-And Hurt-Economy, Economists Say. (Perspectives: News and Views of the Current Research * Technology Management Scene)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.