Monti's Bum Rap: Economically Speaking, Europe's Competition Czar Is Really a `Classic Liberal'-With an Interventionist Streak. (Cover Story)

By Carney, Brian M. | The International Economy, Summer 2002 | Go to article overview

Monti's Bum Rap: Economically Speaking, Europe's Competition Czar Is Really a `Classic Liberal'-With an Interventionist Streak. (Cover Story)


Carney, Brian M., The International Economy


BRUSSELS -- Most Americans familiar with Mario Monti know him as the man who killed the GE-Honeywell merger. For many, their reaction was one of indignation--who's a European bureaucrat, after all, to tell Jack Welch whether GE can buy another American company? Not surprisingly, Monti came to be known as the first European Competition Commissioner to strike down a deal between two American companies after the deal had received antitrust clearance in the United States. He also gained a reputation as an interventionist and a protectionist out to protect Europe's soft, socialistic form of a market economy from American competition.

But Europeans, who are understandably less concerned about the implications of European regulators passing judgment on American business combinations, know a different man. While Monti has scuttled some prominent mergers inside the EU as well, on the Continent he's perhaps best known for his hard line against government subsidies to businesses and for his opposition to state use of "golden shares" held in privatized companies to block their takeover by foreign bidders. In short, at home he's seen as a classical liberal--sometimes to the point of being doctrinaire.

This difference of perception reflects not only different attitudes toward government intervention on either side of the Atlantic, but also the different roles of antitrust regulators and the different standards of evidence and proof in competition cases.

For the record, Monti is a self-described "liberal economist" in the classical sense of that word. But he also sees an aggressive merger-vetting process as an essential component of "making competition work." A good one-word summary of how competition "breaks" in the Commission's view, would be "dominance."

In the U.S., antitrust policy is governed by a "harm to consumer welfare" standard. This standard, in turn, is the product of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that sets the bar at what it called "unreasonable restraint of trade." Since "unreasonable" lacks a certain degree of precision, restraint of trade is generally understood to be "unreasonable" when it starts causing harm to consumer welfare. In other words, what counts is the end result. In the U.S. model, a merger could well pass muster if it resulted in efficiencies that regulators were convinced would lower prices to consumers, even if competition in that market might adversely be affected. In the eyes of U.S. regulators, GE-Honeywell was precisely such a case.

But the EU's standard is different. The EU's governing regulations require the competition commissioner to block a merger if he determines that it will "create or strengthen a dominant position." This is based on a concern that "dominance" increases the likelihood of "abuse" but it eliminates the need to show any actual present or future abuse. So a company that is already dominant cannot engage in acquisitive activity that will increase its dominance, and a non-dominant company cannot acquire a competitor (or anyone else for that matter) if the Commission fears the resulting company (or, increasingly, companies) will dominate its industry or sector.

Some have argued that Europe's "consumer harm" is actually the more restrictive standard--after all, one can easily imagine a situation in which regulators find potential consumer harm without having to show that the merger would result in actual "dominance." In practice, however, the reverse has been consistently true. Since consumer harm is unlikely unless a company can be shown to be "dominant," consumer harm tends to be an additional hurdle for regulators to clear when attempting to block a merger. That is, a company must not only be dominant, but the regulator must show that the dominance is harmful. The EU standard makes dominance presumptively bad in itself.

While in the past Monti has protested that he didn't make the standards, and is merely stuck with applying them, his office is in the process of completing a review of its procedures, including the relevance of the "dominant position" standard.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Monti's Bum Rap: Economically Speaking, Europe's Competition Czar Is Really a `Classic Liberal'-With an Interventionist Streak. (Cover Story)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.