The Quick Discrimination Index: Normative Data and User Guidelines for Counseling Researchers. (Articles)

By Ponterotto, Joseph G.; Potere, Jodi C. et al. | Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, July 2002 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Quick Discrimination Index: Normative Data and User Guidelines for Counseling Researchers. (Articles)


Ponterotto, Joseph G., Potere, Jodi C., Johansen, Scott A., Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development


This article summarizes normative data and psychometric evidence for scores on the Quick Discrimination Index (J. G. Ponterotto et al., 1995; S. O. Utsey & J. G. Ponterotto, 1999). Specific guidelines for counseling researchers and practitioners are provided.

Este articulo resume los datos normativos y evidencia psicometrica para resultados del Indice Rapido de la Discriminacion (J. G. Ponterotto et al., 1995; S. O. Utsey & J. G. Ponterotto, 1999). Las normas especificas para investigadores y profesionales practicantes de la consejeria son proporcionadas.

**********

The last decade has witnessed increasing attention to the important role of professional counselors working with issues of social justice (Lee & Walz, 1998; Ponterotto, Casas, Suzuki, & Alexander, 2001). Chief among these issues is the call for greater activism in fighting racism and ethnic prejudice (Kiselica, 1999; Sandhu & Aspy, 1997). Professional counselors, because of their training in research and measurement, human relations, and multicultural counseling, are ideally equipped to contribute to the scholarly study of prejudice formation and amelioration (Ponterotto & Pedersen, 1993). One important role in the counselor's commitment to social justice and racial harmony is that of scholar and researcher. A necessary tool for the systematic study of prejudice and tolerance is psychometrically sound research instruments.

One such instrument, the Quick Discrimination Index (QDI; Ponterotto et al., 1995; Utsey & Ponterotto, 1999), is being used increasingly by counselors working in the multicultural area. The QDI assesses prejudicial attitudes directed toward racial minority groups and women. High scores on the QDI reflect nonracist and nonsexist attitudes, and low scores reflect negative attitudes toward racial minority individuals and women. Because discrimination is chiefly characterized by negative behavior (e.g., restricting access and equal opportunity), toward select groups, the QDI is not a measure of discrimination in a strict sense but a measure of attitudes underlying potential discriminatory behavior (Ponterotto & Pedersen, 1993).

Recent comprehensive reviews of prejudice instrumentation conducted by both social (Biernat & Crandall, 1999) and counseling (Burkard, Medler, & Boticki, 2001) psychologists found the QDI to be one of the more promising of the available instruments. Although it is used increasingly by multicultural counseling researchers, there is at present no single resource that provides normative data and user guidelines for the QDI. The purpose of this article is to present normative and comparison data on the QDI as culled from an exhaustive review of journal articles and doctoral dissertations. Such a summative data source will provide researchers with a comparative database with which to better interpret and integrate their own QDI results. We also present specific user and data analysis guidelines for the QDI in the hopes of promoting a more systematic data collection process that will facilitate the collective integration of results over time and across many samples and intervention programs.

We begin this brief report with a review of the QDI and its development, followed by tabular summaries of statistical and psychometric properties relative to the QDI subscales. The article ends with a summative evaluation of the QDI and with suggested user guidelines.

development and validation of the QDI

The QDI is a subject-centered scale (Dawis, 1987) that is designed to assess the multidimensional nature of attitudes. Attitudes can be defined as "positive or negative evaluations of objects of thought" (Weiten, 2001, p. 670). Objects of thought may include groups (e.g., women, racial minorities) and social issues (e.g., affirmative action, bilingual education), as well as other targets.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Quick Discrimination Index: Normative Data and User Guidelines for Counseling Researchers. (Articles)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?