Trading Places: Supreme Court Justices Diverged from Old Alliances in Recent Decisions. (Law)

By Murray, Frank J. | Insight on the News, July 29, 2002 | Go to article overview

Trading Places: Supreme Court Justices Diverged from Old Alliances in Recent Decisions. (Law)


Murray, Frank J., Insight on the News


This term, the U.S. Supreme Court revamped death row, revolutionized school policies and expanded state rights, but 15 decisions that might have been expected to be decided 5-4 came in at 6-3, as the usual alliances subtly shifted. The most stable high court in history--the same nine justices have served together for eight terms--slowly has turned more fractious and less conservative on some issues.

The shifting alliances occurred in lower-profile cases than the blockbuster decision for which the 2002 term best will be remembered, when the high court ruled that the Constitution allows vouchers backed by taxpayer funds to be used at parochial schools. That case reflected the lideological split in place since the current lineup began in October 1994. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the vouchers opinion joined by Justices Sandra Day O'Connor, Antonin Scalia, Anthony M. Kennedy and Clarence Thomas. Dissenters were Justices John Paul Stevens, David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer.

This year, the "Rehnquist Five" lined up in 10 of the 18 cases decided by a 5-4 margin. For the first time in five terms, the chief justice was in the majority for 63 of the court's 75 decisions, as often as O'Connor, who usually leads that category.

But the chief justice and O'Connor disagreed with each other on 14 cases. Also, O'Connor did not participate in four cases because of investment conflicts, tying the present court's record for recusals in one term, set by Breyer in his first term on the bench.

At the same time, Rehnquist agreed less often with Thomas--53 cases as opposed to 59 last term--while more frequently joining Ginsburg (48 times compared with 44 the year before) and Breyer (49 times compared with 41 in the 2000-2001 term). These splits showed up in unexpected ways. Most surprising of all was Breyer, who traditionally helps anchor the court's so-called liberal wing. This term he supplied the crucial swing vote in two important 5-4 cases when those who typically vote conservative left the fold:

* To allow schools to drug test the 7 million schoolchildren who join extracurricular programs, even without suspicion that a child used drugs (O'Connor opposed that ruling).

* To reject arguments that juries must confirm factors involved in federal guidelines for imposing mandatory minimum sentences (his vote filled the gap left when Thomas voted with the liberal justices).

But 6-3 votes revealed deeper divisions. In six of those votes the chief justice was in a majority that did not include his usual allies, leaving Scalia and Thomas in a minority. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Trading Places: Supreme Court Justices Diverged from Old Alliances in Recent Decisions. (Law)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.