Freestyle Lawyering: An Expedited Appeal in the New York State Courts

By Ouellette, Alicia R. | Journal of Appellate Practice and Process, Spring 2002 | Go to article overview

Freestyle Lawyering: An Expedited Appeal in the New York State Courts


Ouellette, Alicia R., Journal of Appellate Practice and Process


I. INTRODUCTION

New York's appellate courts normally hear cases on a first come, first served basis. Occasionally, however, when a party can show "urgency or good cause," (1) a court will expedite the appeal process by granting a calendar preference and an expedited briefing schedule. Determining how to obtain that preference and expedited briefing schedule can often be difficult because New York's roles of civil procedure (the CPLR) provide only that "[p]references in the hearing of an appeal may be granted in the discretion of the court to which the appeal is taken." (2) The statutory roles provide no guidance about how to seek a preference or what an application for a preference must show to be successful. Virtually no case law exists on the subject, and even the bible used by New York practitioners, Siegel's New York Practice," (3) does not explain how to expedite an appeal. The sage advice of most experienced appellate attorneys is, then, the most helpful: "Call the clerk's office."

Calling the clerk makes sense because the procedures for expediting an appeal vary from court to court, and no single source systematically outlines the quirks of the procedure used by each court. There are some local court rules: The state's top court, the New York Court of Appeals, has an established procedure, as do two of the four intermediate appellate courts. The other two determine the procedure for dealing with emergency matters on an ad hoc basis that seems to follow unwritten rules that are known to, and understood by, a select few appellate experts.

In some cases, the preferred procedure is a formal motion to be decided by a full panel. Sometimes, a letter request to the clerk's office is sufficient. At other times, a lawyer must go to the home chambers of an individual judge and ask him or her to sign an order to show cause. Because the preferred procedure for expediting a particular appeal depends upon the court in which the appeal will be heard and the facts of a particular case, New York practitioners must rely on experience, their best guess, or the advice of the clerk's office when determining how to initiate an expedited appeal. Obviously, this situation is not ideal. In the most urgent and stressful cases, practitioners must search around for the appropriate procedure, relying at times on nothing more concrete than the voice at the other end of a telephone.

This article will attempt to provide some guidance to practitioners who wish to expedite an appeal in a New York court by first setting forth the existing rules for the court of appeals and each department of the Appellate Division. It will then set forth the preferred practices in those departments that lack published rules, as best those practices can be discerned from the experience of the author and members of the Appeals Bureau of the New York State Attorney General's Office. (4) It will further examine some instances in which New York appellate courts have granted preferences in order to illustrate the sorts of cases in which the effort to expedite an appeal is likely to be successful. Finally, the article will offer some practical tips for bringing an appeal on an expedited basis, including putting a record together and advising a client on when to expect a decision.

II. HOW TO SEEK A PREFERENCE AND EXPEDITED BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A. The New York Court of Appeals

The procedure for obtaining a preference from the court of appeals is simple: Write a letter to the clerk of the court with notice to all other counsel whose clients may be affected. (5) The letter must include "(1) a statement of the nature of the case; (2) the jurisdictional predicate for appeal to the Court of Appeals; (3) the state of readiness of the appeal; (4) all relevant dates, such as the dates of orders and judgments below, the notice of appeal or order granting leave, the dates of filing of briefs and papers on appeal; and (5) the reason why a calendar preference is needed and why it should be granted. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Freestyle Lawyering: An Expedited Appeal in the New York State Courts
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.