Opium and the Beginnings of Chinese Capitalism in Southeast Asia

By Trocki, Carl A. | Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, June 2002 | Go to article overview

Opium and the Beginnings of Chinese Capitalism in Southeast Asia


Trocki, Carl A., Journal of Southeast Asian Studies


This article deals with the relationship between opium revenue farming and the development of capitalist enterprises in Southeast Asia. It examines the role which opium played in the transformation of all Asian economies during the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. While few would deny that the unprecedented expansion of the opium trade by European traders had a major, usually destructive impact on Asian economic systems and political and social institutions, the long-term results of opium in the Asian, particularly Southeast Asian, economies are less well understood. Most specifically, the opium farming systems which existed in virtually every Southeast Asian state (as well as parts of China and India) were important adjuncts of capitalist development in the region.

The practice of farming out portions of the state's revenue was a common one in pre-modern Southeast Asia. In order to collect a tax from their population without spending scarce resources on bureaucracy and infrastructure, most colonial governments, together with indigenous political entities, preferred to 'farm out' revenue collection to private individuals. They would auction off the right to collect a specific tax or to hold the monopoly on the distribution and sale of some excisable item, such as liquor or opium. The monopolist, or farmer, as he was called, provided his own organisation to carry out the task and charged as much as he felt economically realistic to the consumer, paying his overhead and rent to the government and pocketing the remainder as his profit.

There were many different types of farms in nineteenth-century Southeast Asia, including farms for liquor, pork, prostitution, gambling, markets, tolls, capitation taxes and others. Of all the various farms which we find in nineteenth-century Southeast Asia, opium was by far the most lucrative. Opium generated a high level of cash flow and thus created large pools of capital. There were, then, numerous links between capitalist development in Southeast Asia and the opium farms and farmers. More importantly, however, the farms also financed commodity production and helped to generate the infrastructure for consumer economies. These institutions helped to create and finance the state structures that protected businessmen and their profits. I have argued elsewhere that free trade in ports such as Singapore and Hong Kong was possible only because opium revenues provided such reliable and lucrative flows of cash to the colonial governments. In fact, all Asian governments depended upon opium farms for major portions of their revenue. (1)

If we look only at the returns to governments from these institutions, it is clear that the entire colonial project was heavily reliant on opium revenues. In fact, we could even argue that it would have been impossible without them. Certainly this was the case for Singapore and the other Straits Settlements, where opium accounted for between 30 and 60 per cent of the locally collected revenue in every single year for the entire century after 1819, and generally averaged between 40 and 50 per cent of total annual revenues. Other colonies were less dependent on opium and drew revenues from a variety of other sources including trade, land rent, capitation and export production. Nevertheless, opium revenues still came to make up an important and often crucial share of their colonial budget.

Between 1886 and 1895, the Netherlands Indies' farms supplied 18 per cent of the colony's revenue. This figure is based on the total revenues, which included profits from colonial enterprises and trading commodities delivered to Holland. If we look only at tax revenues, opium actually constituted about 35 per cent. In French Cochinchina opium was the single largest revenue-generating operation for two decades; between 1861 and 1882 the Saigon farm contributed about 30 per cent of the colonial revenues. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Opium and the Beginnings of Chinese Capitalism in Southeast Asia
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.