Unrecognized; Churchill's Cold War diplomacy.(BOOKS)

The Washington Times (Washington, DC), September 15, 2002 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Unrecognized; Churchill's Cold War diplomacy.(BOOKS)


Byline: Roger Fontaine, SPECIAL TO THE WASHINGTON TIMES

In 1953, Britain's Prime Minister Winston Churchill was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature. The old warrior was bitterly disappointed. Klaus Larres' study of Churchill's Cold War diplomacy explains precisely why he was so unlike other Laureates. Being merely regarded as a great writer was not enough for Churchill; he wanted the Peace Prize. Above all, Winston wanted the world to recognize his attempts at saving the planet from nuclear suicide.

Churchill, like Lincoln and Napoleon have been written about to the point of utter exhaustion. Never has so much been written by so many for such increasingly smaller returns on investment, it seems. Not this time, however. In fact, Klaus Larres in "Churchill's Cold War" has produced a well-written, scrupulously documented account devoted largely to Churchill's final turn as Prime Minister, four years that most biographers prefer not to dwell on.

No wonder. The usual take on Churchill's return to Downing Street was that the man was too old, too sick, and had too little to show for the time spent in office. In short, the second time around was very much a damp squib. All this is largely true, but it is an incomplete account as the author demonstrates in overwhelming detail. It also leaves out some important phases of the early Cold War and avoids hard questions such as: After Stalin's death could the Cold War have been concluded, thus saving the American taxpayers, for example, trillions of dollars.

Mr. Larres considers these kinds of queries and to his credit weighs the evidence and comes to no final conclusions. That doubtless will sit unwell with Cold Warriors and revisionists alike. Too bad. But in the author's defense, as he points out, the record is far from complete with the old Soviet archives still largely closed on this question.

Still, there remains much to ponder and Churchill's role in attempting to terminate the East-West struggle on terms advantageous to us is well worth examining. So is his penchant for personal diplomacy, an endeavor frequently criticized in direct proportion to the critic's distance from high office. In fact, as the author demonstrates Churchill much before World War II was a vociferous proponent of personal diplomacy. To be exact, it was 1908 that young Winston became a member of the cabinet. It was not long after he was proposing to meet with top German officials in order to keep the two nation's budding naval rivalry from spilling into war. Churchill's older, but hardly wiser, colleagues were opposed and the two empires found themselves at war a few years later.

Churchill's preference for "parleys at the summit" could not be acted on until another war more than three decades later. His wartime meetings with Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman (once at Potsdam), Joseph Stalin, and (once in Cairo) Chiang Kai-shek are familiar even to casual students of 20th century history. The author wastes little time in regurgitating the familiar. But Churchill's objectives merit further consideration. Other than personal ambition and vanity (which the Duke of Marlborough's distinguished descendent had in abundance), Britain's wartime leader had a distinctly patriotic agenda.

First, he wished to promote allied cooperation, which is to say he wanted to be sure the Americans and the Soviets would stay in the war until the Nazis were finished - which was no sure thing, especially with the Russians. Next, he wanted his country to remain a great power. Finally, he wanted an enduring peace that would allow Britain to rebuild its fortunes after being bled white after four decades of war, depression, and war again, not to mention misguided domestic policies that destroyed genuine Victorian virtues to be replaced with utopian prescriptions from the left.

Churchill got some of what he wanted and Britain needed, but not everything.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Unrecognized; Churchill's Cold War diplomacy.(BOOKS)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?