The Strategic Potential of Sequencing Apologia Stases: President Clinton's Self-Defense in the Monica Lewinsky Scandal

By Kramer, Michael R.; Olson, Kathryn M. | Western Journal of Communication, Summer 2002 | Go to article overview

The Strategic Potential of Sequencing Apologia Stases: President Clinton's Self-Defense in the Monica Lewinsky Scandal


Kramer, Michael R., Olson, Kathryn M., Western Journal of Communication


During 1998 and 1999, President Bill Clinton faced a series of "kategoria," or accusations, regarding his relationship with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky. Led by Special Prosecutor Kenneth Starr, the Congress, the media, and the public all played multiple roles during this unfolding drama, each acting either by turn or sometimes simultaneously as accuser, witness, judge. The tenor of accusations changed repeatedly as new evidence against Clinton gradually emerged; each fresh revelation not only complicated the President's task of offering an adequate self-defense, or "apologia," but also called into question his previous attempts. In spite of its etymological kinship with the word "apology," "apologia" refers to any defense of oneself or one's actions. The rhetorical tradition identifies four possible "stases" or choices of pivotal places from which an apologist might take a stand against accusers: issues of fact, definition, jurisdiction, and quality. Because the stases' defense strategies are largely incompatible with each other, a credible apologist usually selects among them based on the nature of the accusation faced (see Ryan, 1982, 1984) and the specific audience responsible for deciding that kategoria-apologia contest.

This essay contends that Clinton survived the Lewinsky scandal because he employed a graduated apologia strategy that progressed through the stases. The kategoria and the nature of the evidence against him changed constantly. As it was made public, each wave of new evidence refocused the nature of the charges against Clinton and revised or enlarged the pool of recognized judges and range of potential consequences. Further, as a national figure in a media age, there was pressure for Clinton to respond immediately to each development, without knowing if or when the charges against him would change again. Clinton made more than 20 public statements during the Lewinsky scandal's 1998-1999 duration, statements that ranged from denials to admissions, from assurances of cooperation to questions about the process's legitimacy, and from calls for national unity to politically divisive counter-attacks. As he dealt with new developments, Clinton also needed to avoid any further disclosures that might help his accusers. Viewed as a contiguous set rather than as discrete apologia, his twenty-plus statements formed a graduated series of stasis-centered responses in which each defense included the minimal amount of detail possible, exercised ambiguity to preserve future access to the stases not featured prominently in that statement, and over time moved from an emphasis on denial to an emphasis on jurisdiction and definition then finally to an emphasis on quality. The scandal's highest stakes were criminal and civil penalties and the Clinton presidency itself. Ultimately, although with his credibility in tatters, the President salvaged both his office and avoided post-presidency prosecution.

Beyond better appreciating this particular case, understanding Clinton's progressive apologia is important for at least two reasons. First, it emphasizes the importance of studying apologia that takes more complex forms than the established single pivotal speech (e.g., Nixon's 1952 "Checkers" speech; Edward Kennedy's 1969 "Chappaquiddick" address). Viewed as discrete apologia, most of Clinton's many statements were judged inadequate, as further evidenced by the rhetor's felt need to continue issuing and varying his self-defenses. The Clinton case offers a well-documented instance in which the kategoria continually evolved and called forth multiple responses and in which the influence of the serial apologia as a whole differed from its discrete parts. A few apologia studies (Henry, 1988; Heisey, 1988) have suggested the utility of studying the evolution of rhetorical accusations and multiple self-defense speech sets. With some notable exceptions, largely centered on corporations' image restoration campaigns (Benoit, 1995; Benoit & Brinson, 1994; Huxman & Bruce, 1995; Hearit, 1995) or an apologist's struggle toward symbolic perfection in response to "hierarchical psychosis" rather than strategic need (Moore, 1997), apologia studies tend to focus on single apologists responding in a single public statement to a well-defined kategoria.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Strategic Potential of Sequencing Apologia Stases: President Clinton's Self-Defense in the Monica Lewinsky Scandal
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.