Waiver of Informed Consent, Cultural Sensitivity, and the Problem of Unjust Families and Traditions

By Hyun, Insoo | The Hastings Center Report, September-October 2002 | Go to article overview

Waiver of Informed Consent, Cultural Sensitivity, and the Problem of Unjust Families and Traditions


Hyun, Insoo, The Hastings Center Report


Caring for patients from different cultures presents a variety of challenges. One of the most complex centers on a worry that the formal requirements for obtaining informed consent may impose a Western ideal of personal autonomy on some minority patients, especially those who come from cultures that favor what appears to be a family-centered model of decisionmaking over a more individualistic mode. (1) Contrary to the current informed consent standards of full disclosure and patient self-determination, many minority patients may wish to remain uninvolved in the medical decisionmaking process, wanting instead to defer to their families' choices.

In one well-known study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, for instance, researchers reported that elderly Korean Americans and Mexican Americans were less likely than elderly African Americans and European Americans to believe that a patient should be told of a terminal prognosis (35 percent and 48 percent versus 63 percent and 69 percent) and less likely to believe that the patient should make decisions about the use of life-support technology (28 percent and 41 percent versus 60 percent and 65 percent). Elderly Korean Americans (57 percent) and Mexican Americans (45 percent) were said to be more likely than the other two groups to believe that the family and not the patient should make end of life decisions. (2)

Cultural differences like these warn us of a potentially serious problem in the delivery of heath care today: namely, that providers who are unaware of such variable expectations may inadvertently transgress the cultural integrity and personal dignity of some of their minority patients through well-meaning efforts to obtain informed consent in the usual, patient-centered manner--contravening, in the process, the very principle of respect for persons that the doctrine of informed consent was meant to protect.

In response to this concern, some commentators have recommended that providers broaden their view of autonomy to accommodate the cultural values ethnically diverse patients might bring to medical decisionmaking, including a preference to waive their right to informed consent and relinquish decisionmaking authority to their families. Lawrence Gostin has suggested that the medical community can best preserve its overall commitment to personal autonomy by allowing patients to stray from a Western model of independent medical decisionmaking and act in the manner that best accords with their own cultural values) According to this view, providers can help advance this goal by first asking their minority patients which they would prefer: to be informed about their illnesses and involved in making treatment decisions, or to have their families handle these matters for them. (4)

This proposal seems consistent with the medical professions current norm of allowing variable degrees of patient involvement, as directed by the patient's values. That is, since a patient's right to self-determination includes both the right to decide whether to receive full information and the right to opt out of making treatment decisions altogether, most accept that physicians may be discharged of their duty to fulfill formal consent requirements at the request of their patients. (5) This idea appears to be modified only slightly by the claim that the standard course for obtaining informed consent can be justifiably set aside when patients communicate a culturally based desire not to be informed of their diagnosis or prognosis and to have their families make decisions for them. (6)

The call for cultural sensitivity should be lauded for encouraging physicians to consider such diverse sorts of patients' values. Nonetheless, the ethical issues involved in this call are much more complex and difficult than is frequently recognized. They cannot be resolved by merely broadening our view of autonomy. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Waiver of Informed Consent, Cultural Sensitivity, and the Problem of Unjust Families and Traditions
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.