Community Treatment of Extremely Troublesome Youth with Dual Mental Health/mental Retardation Diagnoses: A Data Based Case Study

By Fabry, Bernard D.; Reitz, Andrew L. et al. | Education & Treatment of Children, August 2002 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Community Treatment of Extremely Troublesome Youth with Dual Mental Health/mental Retardation Diagnoses: A Data Based Case Study


Fabry, Bernard D., Reitz, Andrew L., Luster, W. Clark, Education & Treatment of Children


Abstract

This report describes a data-based case study of a linked array of community based treatment services that appears to have been effective for extremely troublesome dual diagnosed children and adolescents. Hallmarks believed to be relevant to the successes achieved are described, followed by long-term data supporting treatment effectiveness. This report provides apparent support at the data-based case study level for applied research, and presents a simple evaluation strategy that can be used in clinical settings.

**********

As human services continue to evolve from institutional models of care to community based and managed care models, there is an increasing need for documentation of effective community based services for children and adolescents with both developmental disabilities and mental health diagnoses, and the most challenging problems (Mason, Galvin, & Basford, 1998; Small, Kennedy, & Bender, 1991). There is a growing body of literature confirming that children and adolescents entering out-of-home care now are more disturbed than in the past (Dore, 1999; Hochstadt, Joudes, Zimo, & Schachater, 1987; Knitzer, 1989; McIntyre & Keesler, 1986; Urquiza, Wirtz, Peterson, & Singer, 1994). These youth place great demands on community based services, and evidence based models of effective service delivery are needed.

It has been suggested that research is extremely difficult to accomplish in community-based clinical programs (Mason et al., 1998; Scotti, Ujcich, Weigle, Holland, & Kirk, 1996; Stein, 1995). The clients present widely differing needs and the demands on staff are intense and variable, making it difficult to hold critical variables constant while systematically varying others. However, applied research in more controlled settings does suggest what ought to constitute best practice in community based clinical settings. It has been suggested that the most effective interventions for youths can be provided by the adults who live and interact with the youths in the context of their everyday lives (Durrant, 1993; Hobbs, 1982). A number of researchers also have suggested that functional analysis, or functional assessment, provides a model for identifying effective interventions (Carr et al., 1999; Gable, 1996; Horner, 1994; Horner & Carr, 1997; Kemp & Carr, 1995). Data-based case studies from clinical settings can p rovide a bridge between rigorous applied research and everyday clinical settings by providing some validation of the more formal research as well as suggesting promising directions for future research.

The purpose of the present report is to present a data-based case study using a simple program evaluation strategy that suggests the effectiveness of a community based clinical program serving very challenging children and adolescents with a wide variety of problems. The clinical components of the program outlined below were adopted and adapted from promising practices reported in the applied research literature.

Program Description

Participants

The participants included 15 boys and 3 girls with dual mental retardation and mental health diagnoses, referred for out-of-home placements due to the severity of their behavior. Table 1 lists their ages, IQ scores when reported, diagnoses given in admission documents, and primary presenting problems. At the time of admission the youths ranged in age from 4 to 17 years with a median age of 12 years. Since IQ scores were not a requirement for admission, only diagnoses of mental retardation were available for some youths. For the remaining youths IQ scores fell in the profound range (low of 16) to the mild range (high of 71) of mental retardation with the median in the moderate range. Diagnoses at admission included attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism/pervasive developmental disorder, bipolar disorder, oppositional defiance disorder, post-traumatic shock disorder, schizo-affective disorder, and trichotillomania.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Community Treatment of Extremely Troublesome Youth with Dual Mental Health/mental Retardation Diagnoses: A Data Based Case Study
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?