The Evolution of Organizational Niches: U.S. Automobile Manufacturers, 1885-1981

By Dobrev, Stanislav D.; Kim, Tai-Young et al. | Administrative Science Quarterly, June 2002 | Go to article overview

The Evolution of Organizational Niches: U.S. Automobile Manufacturers, 1885-1981


Dobrev, Stanislav D., Kim, Tai-Young, Carroll, Glenn R., Administrative Science Quarterly


Many analysts' accounts of the U.S. automobile industry's development, including conjectured reasons for particular firms succeeding and failing, can be readily interpreted from the perspective of the organizational niche. For instance, General Motors' historical success against Ford is hailed by many as the consequence of its early wide-ranging multiproduct market position--a broad niche, in ecological terms. In more recent years, the Japanese manufacturers showed that they could build a sizeable presence after entering the market with small low-cost cars, a part of the market in which major American producers were not very competitive. According to a niche interpretation, one would say that the Japanese firms benefited from initial niche positions with little overlap from existing firms, allowing them to gain strength before attempting more direct competition.

In the background of such niche-based processes, the competitive dynamics of the automobile industry have been driven by both cost and innovation, each of which is tied to scale. The scale of automobile production has increased steadily over the last century, and the race to remain competitively large often constitutes a main reason why automobile firms behave as they do. For instance, insider accounts of the recent round of mergers among large automakers, such as Chrysler and Daimler, point to the increasing scale of the global industry as the critical motivation (Vlasic and Stertz, 2000). As a result of this scale orientation, the automobile industry is characterized generally by a long-term evolutionary pattern of increasing concentration.

Industry consolidation and a trend toward market oligopoly have also marked the evolutionary paths of numerous other industries. Examples from various sectors of the U.S. economy include the wine and beer industries, the airline industry, the petroleum production industry, the motion-picture distribution industry, the microcomputer industry, and the steel industry, to name a few. Concentration propels the formation of a strong and visible market structure whose effects inevitably reverberate through all levels of the social system, influencing the behavior of both economic and non-economic actors. For instance, industrial organization economists have shown that a broad spectrum of a firm's activities and processes are directly affected by the rising industrial concentration: incentives to innovate, mechanisms for price setting, the expectation for investment returns and stability, budgeting for advertising expenses, and the distribution of wages all seem to hinge on the rising market power of a few dominant p roducers and the relationships evolving among them. Yet few economists have focused on analyzing the social dimension of market structure. By Scherer's (1970: 210) account, "the economist is forced, without denying their importance, to view variations in industry conduct and performance due to differences in social structure as an unexplained residual or 'noise'." At one level, our goal here is to demonstrate that this "unexplained" component of the contextual constraints and opportunities faced by organizations operating in concentrating industries contains important and systematic processes of organizational evolution that analysts can ill afford to ignore.

In many industries in which scale provides an advantage, the gradual rise to dominance of a few large competitors is accompanied by a horizontal expansion of their market positions or niches. This is the case with the Daimler-Chrysler merger in the auto industry, the WarnerBros.-Lorimar merger in the motion-picture distribution industry, the LTV-Republic merger in the steel industry, and the American-TWA merger in the airline industry. Accordingly, it seems important that analyses of organizational evolution in concentrating industries deal with questions of niche and scale simultaneously and how they interrelate.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Evolution of Organizational Niches: U.S. Automobile Manufacturers, 1885-1981
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.