Treaty Needed to Protect Canada's Interests. (Security and Sovereignty)

By Roussel, Stephane | Canadian Speeches, September-October 2002 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Treaty Needed to Protect Canada's Interests. (Security and Sovereignty)

Roussel, Stephane, Canadian Speeches

Closer integration of Canadian and American national security is inevitable, and could be used by the United States as a pretext to affect Canadian economic and social policies. To protect its interests, Canada is urged to seek a formal security treaty that sets forth long-term objectives. From evidence present in Toronto, May 7.

What do we mean by this concept of a security perimeter? I must say that there are no definitions that have been unanimously agreed to. Generally speaking, the definitions are based on statements made by American ambassadors: Paul Cellucci, who is currently ambassador, and his predecessor, Gordon Griffin, clarified what was meant by this concept.

This concept involved, first of all, closer co-operation between the two states. Secondly, it means strengthening already existing measures. Thirdly, the concept involves the systematic use of new technology to enhance border control and speed up the border crossing process. Fourthly, and this is the most important point, it means harmonizing the policies of both governments in areas that include, in particular, immigration, border control, intelligence, defence and security, and, in particular, law enforcement...

There are three problems that pertain to the evolution of the security concept. The first difficulty is the limitation of operational sectors covered by this concept. This means immigration, border management, intelligence but, as well, many other sectors where there is a great deal more ambiguity.

For example, on December 19, American Ambassador Paul Cellucci talked about the need to cooperate more closely in the energy sector, tying this cooperation to the strengthening of security in North America. So he is using the pretext of security to call for negotiations in the sectors that are quite far removed from security. This also applies to the health sector. Preparation in the event of a bioterrorist attack can be used as a pretext for greater co-operation between the two countries in health matters, and, as a result, this could eventually have an impact on the Canadian health system. This is also true for the carrying of weapons, and, as well, if we want to carry the argument even further, the sale of potable water. Indeed, very few sectors are excluded from the pretext of security, explaining why it is so important for Canada, in particular, to define the limitations of cooperation between the two states very carefully.

The second question that arises from this concept of the security perimeter is, obviously, that of geographical limitations. The question that we must ask ourselves is as follows: should we invite Mexico to be involved in the security perimeter? Opinions vary on this issue. Some stress the fact that the problems found at the Canadian-American border are totally different from those found at the Mexican-American border, and if we were to invite Mexico to participate in the security perimeter, we may well find ourselves forced to Mexicanize the process at the Canadian border, which would involve much more rigorous restrictions and controls than we currently have.

The opposing argument, and one that I agree with, is that it is not possible to have a two-tier free trade agreement. It is not possible to have a second-class member. And by that I mean Mexico. Economic integration requires security integration. The two are closely linked, and I do not think that we can leave Mexico on the sidelines for very long.

I think that the Canadian government should look into this matter because my discussions with my Mexican colleagues reveal that Mexico is somewhat uncomfortable about Canada's attitude.

The third and final issue that I would like to raise this morning, and which, in my opinion, is perhaps the most important one, pertains to the way that the security perimeter is organized. Very briefly, I would say that this perimeter could evolve in four different ways.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Treaty Needed to Protect Canada's Interests. (Security and Sovereignty)


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?