The Problem of Iraq

By Ramsay, Allan | Contemporary Review, October 2002 | Go to article overview

The Problem of Iraq


Ramsay, Allan, Contemporary Review


AT the time of writing it seems quite possible that President Bush will, sooner or later, commit US forces to action against Iraq. In the last two weeks Vice-President Cheney and Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld have spoken publicly in terms which make intervention more probable than not. The Head of the National Security Agency (NSA) has spoken in similar terms in a press interview. Officials speaking on behalf of the US Administration have made it clear that there is a de-coupling between their objectives vis-a-vis Iraq and the question of Iraqi compliance with UN Security Council resolutions on Weapons Inspection. What they are seeking is 'regime change', ie, the removal of Saddam Hussein and his replacement by... By what? The best on offer seems to be some sort of coalition of opposition forces currently in exile and hitherto considered as hardly worth the attention of serious governments anywhere.

Internationally there has been growing opposition to US policies. Almost without exception Arab countries of the region have warned against military intervention, fearing the destabilising effects of what might follow. There are - to put it no more strongly - serious misgivings among members of the EU. The public debate in the US is warming up. There are strong reservations in Congress and senior figures, Republicans among them, emphasised the grave risks that the US runs and urged the need for caution, especially against the thought that the US could in the event 'go it alone' if no international support were forthcoming. It is thought that the UK will have a key role to play insofar as Mr Blair is believed to have President Bush's ear. After his outspoken support for joint US-UK action, Mr Blair flew to Washington to confer with President Bush on 8 September. So far as one can judge at this stage UK public opinion is opposed to military intervention in support of the US. There is vocal opposition in the ranks of the Labour Party. Mr Kennedy has distanced the Lib-Dems from the current idea of intervention without international sanction and unconnected to the issue of Weapons Inspection. Mr Duncan Smith however has apparently written in support of action and his Conservative supporters favour action. These positions will clearly continue to evolve over the forthcoming weeks of party conferences and the like. They suggest however that the US Administration still has a lot of persuading to do.

There is of course the world of difference between lack of international support and outright opposition among the regional and other countries concerned, either because they may be asked to commit forces or because they have interests there, as almost everyone does including countries as distant as New Zealand which had in Iraq a profitable market for mutton. Many, Iraq's neighbours perhaps most of all, might be glad to see the back of the present Iraqi regime. As recent events have twice demonstrated beyond doubt, in Saddam Hussein's ambitious and unscrupulous hands, its wealth, pivotal geographic position, potential military capability and human resources pose a threat of continued instability. And yet they have survived his attentions and thwarted his ambitions, Iran by in effect defeating him in an eight-year war and Kuwait by invoking the UN Charter and the aid of its Western and Arab allies. The issue of continued Iraqi non-compliance with UN Security Council Resolutions over Weapons Inspections remains a matter of grave anxiety but it is not in their view one which justifies a military intervention of a kind and on a scale which would be necessary to remove Saddam Hussein. They are in favour of de-coupling, more accurately a reverse de-coupling, for reasons quite different from those of the US but to them quite as valid and important. Better the devil you know...

To the idealist or the ideologue or those of the purity of the newly converted or those inspired with the Churchillian example of the 1930s this might not seem a courageous attitude.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Problem of Iraq
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.