Research in Endangered Species Conservation: An Introduction to Multiple Methods. (Concepts)

By Clark, Tim W.; Reading, Richard P. et al. | Endangered Species Update, July-August 2002 | Go to article overview

Research in Endangered Species Conservation: An Introduction to Multiple Methods. (Concepts)


Clark, Tim W., Reading, Richard P., Wallace, Richard L., Endangered Species Update


Abstract

Diverse methods may be required to understand and solve conservation problems in species recovery. These problems are usually multi-faceted. Endangered species recovery is a biological challenge, but it also requires that professionals and the public support an organized recovery effort in a timely, rational, and effective way. Biological, social, and interdisciplinary methods all lend themselves to aid the multi-dimensional task of species recovery, although social science and interdisciplinary methods are little used currently. These three kinds of methodological approaches are briefly examined. We end the paper with a call for increased interdisciplinary approaches, as we believe they promise greater effectiveness in species conservation.

Introduction

Endangered species conservation is usually a complex, multi-dimensional challenge. As such, endangered species recovery programs require the use of diverse methods to determine which processes threaten a species and what to do to achieve recovery. Interdisciplinary approaches that incorporate multiple methods in biology and the social sciences promise to improve species restoration efforts. Biological methods focus on the species and its ecosystem. Social science methods examine the decision and social processes, including how the values and perspectives of participants and the situation affect recovery efforts. Interdisciplinary methods systematically integrate biological and social research into a unified recovery program.

Many universities offer programs in biological and social methods, and a few even offer interdisciplinary programs that address the full challenge posed by endangered species conservation. The established, but separate, disciplines (e.g., wildlife biology, sociology, policy analysis) train professionals to be knowledgeable in different methods. Despite the obvious need for professionals skilled in integrative approaches, there are few jobs in endangered species recovery that explicitly utilize interdisciplinary problem solvers. Fortunately, the situation is changing. Conservation and related professions, university training programs, and the organizational contexts of practice are in flux today and prospects for using fully integrative methodologies in the future is improving. We expect that interdisciplinary approaches using multiple methods and inclusive participation will significantly improve success rates over more narrow approaches that rely on a limited set of methods, a single discipline, or domination by single (or just a few), self-interested people or organizations.

In this paper, we (1) offer a brief overview of multiple methods in endangered species recovery, (2) look briefly at available biological and social science methods, and (3) introduce an interdisciplinary approach we believe best uses and integrates knowledge obtained from the diverse biological and social methods currently employed to restore endangered species.

Multiple methods: a strategy in species recovery

Using multiple methods in endangered species recovery is like triangulation wherein a radio collared Florida panther's (Felis concolor) location is located, or `fixed,' using three receiver readings from different angles. As conservationists, we can best get a `fix' on a conservation problem by using different methods, ideally a combination of biological and social science methods. In our case, triangulation means using and integrating data from diverse sources about a problem and its context. It means using different investigators, ideally working in close collaboration. Different theories should guide work and interpret data. Multiple methods should be used to investigate a problem from different perspectives in order to develop the fullest possible picture of the conservation problem and alternatives to address it. Just as using multiple methods to address a specific research interest increases the reliability of results (e. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Research in Endangered Species Conservation: An Introduction to Multiple Methods. (Concepts)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.