Privatization Serves Bush's Pals

The Register Guard (Eugene, OR), December 11, 2002 | Go to article overview

Privatization Serves Bush's Pals


Byline: MICHAEL L. HALLINAN For The Register-Guard

PRESIDENT BUSH'S PLAN to indiscriminately turn over countless government services to for-profit corporate contractors, and destroy the jobs of 850,000 federal employees in the process, is a serious threat to the well-being of our community.

Under the president's plan, billions of taxpayer dollars are about to be transferred to big business. We're told that this will be good for taxpayers and for Americans who rely on critical federal services. The Enrons and WorldComs of the world, the argument goes, will put their pursuit of profits and political influence aside and provide better services - from Social Security claims to environmental protection - at less cost and with more efficiency, because they care about taxpayers and working families.

Yeah, right - I may have been born in the dark, but I wasn't born last night.

And just to make sure life isn't too rough on his buddies, President Bush killed three labor rules opposed by federal contractors through executive order. He also repealed a federal contracting rule that would have required government procurement officials to consider companies' labor records before awarding them contracts.

If President Bush really cared about working families, he wouldn't be going out of his way to deny federal employees representational rights. He wouldn't be forcing local communities to pick up the tab for laid-off workers. He wouldn't be denying local economies a secure core of middle-class workers.

The spin-weavers in Washington have shrewdly packaged the president's plan. They say that transferring existing programs and untold millions of our tax dollars to big business will give working people the best value for our buck by encouraging competition and reducing the size of government. The facts paint a very different picture.

The president's plan explicitly avoids competition. Instead, federal agencies are encouraged to directly transfer existing programs and our tax dollars to corporate contractors without any bidding process. The charade continues with the failure of the administration to require corporations that already have fat government contracts to compete with the government to see if they really are as good as they claim they are. How this approach provides the best value escapes me.

The claim that the size of government will be reduced is equally devious but untrue. You do the math: The fact of the matter is there are between 1.75 and 1.9 million employees on the payroll of our government's executive branch. This is the smallest this workforce has been since the Kennedy administration. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Privatization Serves Bush's Pals
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.