Archaeology and `QAA Subject Review': What Did We Learn? (News & Notes)

By Harding, Anthony; Johnson, Matthew | Antiquity, December 2002 | Go to article overview

Archaeology and `QAA Subject Review': What Did We Learn? (News & Notes)


Harding, Anthony, Johnson, Matthew, Antiquity


In the middle of March 2002, with the last review of a Department of Archaeology in England, the process of assessing the quality of academic courses by Subject Specialist Reviewers (SSRs) appointed by the Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) came to a temporary halt. The programme of reviews has been in existence since 1991 and, as it happens, archaeology was one of the last subjects to be reviewed--though it was assessed in Welsh universities as long ago as 1995-96, and in Scotland the process is continuing, with archaeology yet to be done. The editors of ANTIQUITY have already drawn attention to the process in an editorial (Malone 2000: 741).

The process in England and Northern Ireland started in September 2000 with Cambridge and concluded in March 2002 with Southampton. All archaeology staff in English universities and in Queen's University Belfast have been living with the `subject review', formerly `teaching quality assessment' or TQA, for the last 18 months, as have those in other subject areas since 1991. In this article, we want to cast an eye back on the experience. We were both trained as SSRs and both had much to do with the review of our own Department, and took part in seven reviews of other departments, as well as being called in to offer some guidance to others. While we had mixed feelings about taking part in the process, we learnt a lot from the experience.

The purpose of this article is to describe the process of subject review, and ask the question: what have we (by which we mean the wider academic community within archaeology) learnt from the experience? We are conscious, also, that academic archaeologists in other countries around the world may well face similar experiences in the near future. Will the British experience be mirrored elsewhere, or will others find different ways of dealing with issues of quality and accountability? We want to stress that the views expressed here are personal ones, and do not necessarily reflect the views of other reviewers--though our experience suggests that many of them are in fact shared by the rest of the team. What is written here certainly does not reflect the official views of the QAA: it will become apparent below that we have both positive and negative critical comments to make on that organization, the methodologies it has developed and related developments in higher education as a whole.

Origins

The assessment of the quality of education in particular departments is a process that had its origins in the Thatcherite years of the 1980s and early 1990s. Conservative politicians were fond of pronouncing on the need for accountability among all public sector services, to ensure that `taxpayers' money was well spent'. Specifically, the reforms of the Thatcher governments were intended to introduce market principles into public institutions, though this principle was never really introduced far into universities on the student front--rather the reverse, with the amalgamation of the `old' and `new' university sectors in 1992. A raft of regulatory requirements were imposed on education, health and local councils, and universities got their share, initially as a consequence of a deal struck with the lecturers' unions over pay. Many of these related to financial and management audits, but for academics on the ground two were of primary importance: the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) and Teaching Quality Assessment (TQA).

Few things have brought about as much apprehension, indeed terror, in higher education as the prospect of `inspectors' sitting in on lectures and tutorials and the thought of outsiders riffling through filing cabinets of critical examiners reports, imperfectly written (or absent) minutes of meetings, accounts of student complaints and the like. Strong men and women have blanched, shed tears or both, as the potential implications of a TQA visitation sank in and as the scare stories and Chinese whispers circulated (Halstead 2001 gives a graphic description of one department in turmoil). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Archaeology and `QAA Subject Review': What Did We Learn? (News & Notes)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.