Speeding Adoptions: An Evaluation of the Effects of Judicial Continuity

By Festinger, Trudy; Pratt, Rachel | Social Work Research, December 2002 | Go to article overview

Speeding Adoptions: An Evaluation of the Effects of Judicial Continuity


Festinger, Trudy, Pratt, Rachel, Social Work Research


This study investigated the effects of a New York City adoption reform project. Goals of the project were to change existing family court procedures in selected cases to shorten the duration of time between termination of parental rights (TPR) and adoption finalization. Randomly selected control cases received the usual procedures, whereas the service group received the expedited court procedures. The latter consisted of filing adoption petitions at the time of the TPR, thereby keeping cases on the court calendar and usually before the same judge from the point of freeing through to finalization. At the conclusion of data collection, more children in the service group than in the control group had been adopted, and survival analysis showed that they were adopted in a significantly shorter time.

Key words: adoption; court procedures; evaluation; foster care; survival analysis

**********

Can keeping a case in the same county, before the same judge, and on the court calendar from termination of parental rights (TPR) through adoption speed up the adoption process for children in foster care? The study reported here sought an answer to this question. It did so by developing a project that implemented a little-used New York state law that permits the filing of an adoption petition while the TPR is pending. This allowed the adoption proceeding to remain in the same court and with the same judge who presided over the freeing.

RESEARCH CONTEXT

National policies in child welfare have produced major changes in adoption practice over the past 25 years as the child welfare field and the public became more aware of children adrift in what so often has been called "the limbo" of foster care. These changes came after a number of studies highlighted the fiscal and emotional consequences of children remaining in out-of-home care for long periods without permanent plans (see, for example, Fanshel & Shinn, 1978; Maluccio, Fein, Hamilton, Klier, & Ward, 1980). Concerns about children lingering in foster care led to efforts to reduce impermanence and spawned the permanency planning movement (Rzepnicki, 1987; Smith & Howard, 1999).

The philosophy of permanency was codified at the federal level through passage of the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980 (P.L. 96-272). In the years that followed, the emphasis on permanency planning resulted in the freeing, through TPR, of a growing number of children in foster care and their placement in homes likely to adopt. Adoption became the preferred outcome over long-term out-of-home care for children who could not grow up in their birth families (Barth, 1997; Berry, 1998). Although adoptions of foster children remained fairly flat between 1983 and 1993, since then the total number of such adoptions in the United States has risen (Freundlich, 2000; Maza, 2000).

With the emphasis on permanency came a desire that it be reached in a timely way. Concern about time frames led to passage of the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 (ASFA) (P.L. 105-89) that called for the prompt establishment of permanency goals for children, emphasized the importance of reaching permanence without delay, and permitted an award of adoption incentive funds to states (Maza, 1999). Thus, ASFA focused a spotlight on accelerating permanency, including speeding the adoption process. To support permanency efforts, the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System routinely reports estimates of the average number of months between TPR and final adoption among children adopted from the public foster care system. Estimates for fiscal year 1999, based on 52 jurisdictions reporting on 46,000 adoptions, 64 percent of which were by unrelated foster parents, showed this average to be 16 months, and a median of 12 months (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2000).

State efforts to speed adoptions range from Newark, New Jersey's system of reviewing all cases six months after TPR and scheduling hearings if adoptions have not yet been completed, to Portland, Oregon's "best interests hearings," held after the filing of TPR petitions in an effort to decrease the number of TPR appeals (National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges [NCJFCJ], 2000b). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Speeding Adoptions: An Evaluation of the Effects of Judicial Continuity
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.